A study evaluating the oxalate content of foods as reported by two reputable sources shows discordance.
This finding is important clinically and also with respect to conducting and interpreting research, said Kristina L. Penniston, PhD, RDN, CD, at the 2016 World Congress of Endourology in Cape Town, South Africa.
Have you read - Study: Statin users less likely to develop kidney stones
“The lack of agreement between these two sources is striking considering that regulating the oxalate content of food is an important component in managing some patients with hyperoxaluria. Patients need accurate information in order to successfully limit their oxalate intake and so that they do not unnecessarily restrict their intake of certain foods,” said Dr. Penniston, scientist in the department of urology at the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine & Public Health, and clinical nutritionist at the University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison.
“Furthermore,” she added, “when designing intervention trials in which oxalate intake is a variable or research outcome, we need to have standardized values for oxalate content in order to be able to compare and apply the results from different studies.”
Recognizing the absence of standardized food oxalate values, Dr. Penniston and colleagues at the University of Wisconsin compared the data reported on a publicly available database of food oxalate content (maintained by the Harvard University School of Public Health) with values from the Nutrition Data System for Research (NDSR), a nutrient analysis software program.
“The data on the Harvard website provide information for 536 foods analyzed using liquid chromatography, which is considered the gold-standard, state-of-the art method for oxalate analysis. The NDSR is designed to be used by registered dietitians for nutrient analysis and is considered a high-quality resource, but the oxalate values it lists are from an array of laboratories that used a variety of analytical methods,” Dr. Penniston explained.
“Considering the different sources and techniques that are used to measure oxalate content, it is not surprising at all to see variability in values. And, our study compared only two of the most reputable sources. Patients searching the Internet can find hundreds of sites claiming to give oxalate content, and we expect to see even more variability across all of those sites.”
Comparisons for the 536 foods found on the Harvard University website showed a lack of concordance overall between the two data sources compared in this study, and differences were in both directions; ie, the NDSR nutrient analysis software listed higher oxalate values for some foods yet lower oxalate values for others. Although there was some correspondence between the two data sources with respect to foods identified as having the highest oxalate content, the milligrams of oxalate per serving often differed significantly.