Bill would delay implementation of pay-for-performance reporting program
A group of medical specialty organizations, including AUA, is pushing new legislation that would delay permanent implementation of Medicare's "pay for performance" quality reporting program to allow for a more orderly transition to the new system of Medicare reimbursement.
Sponsored by Senators Benjamin L. Cardin (D-MD) and Arlen Specter (R-PA), the Voluntary Medicare Quality Reporting Act of 2007 was introduced in late May on behalf of the Alliance of Specialty Medicine, of which AUA is a member. The Alliance represents more than 200,000 physicians nationwide.
Introduced in the House of Representatives by Bart Gordon (D-TN) and John Shadegg (R-AZ) in mid-June, the legislation would amend the provision in the Tax Relief and Health Care Act of 2006 that requires the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to develop a new quality reporting program for 2008, even before a 6-month trial of the 2007 Physician Quality Reporting Initiative (PQRI) is completed.
In introducing the bill, Cardin pointed out that the PQRI program was established last year when Congress prevented a scheduled across-the-board cut of 5.1% in Medicare physician reimbursement rates and froze payment levels. Under PQRI, providers became eligible for a one-time bonus payment of 1.5% of total allowed Medicare charges if they reported certain quality measures starting in July 2007.
"Everyone wants the best possible care for Medicare beneficiaries," Cardin said, "but I am very concerned about moving forward with standards that have not been adequately tested. We must have the right process in place for defining quality measures, and a good system needs sufficient time to assess its appropriateness and effectiveness."
Key components of the bil include:
Prior paid malpractice claims linked to increased risk of future claims
February 22nd 2023Based on 5- and 10-year study periods, physicians with single or multiple paid medical malpractice claims “were shown to have a greatly elevated risk of having additional paid claims during a future period,” the authors wrote.
Surprise billing regulation stuns providers, rejects congressional intent
November 17th 2021"The AACU joined 1 effort calling for the administration to remove the directive that arbiters anchor their determination to the qualifying payment amount, and instead let them consider all allowable information submitted by the parties to support their offer," says Ross E. Weber of the AACU.
