Dr. Garje highlights use of PARP inhibitors in prostate cancer


In a recent interview, Rohan Garje, MD, chief of genitourinary oncology at the Miami Cancer Institute, discussed the evolving paradigm with PARP inhibitors in prostate cancer.

What is the current state of PARP inhibitor use in prostate cancer?

"PARP inhibitors are now being explored with other agents beyond androgen receptor pathway inhibitors, such as in combination with theranostic agents. It is definitely exciting," says Rohan Garje, MD.

"PARP inhibitors are now being explored with other agents beyond androgen receptor pathway inhibitors, such as in combination with theranostic agents. It is definitely exciting," says Rohan Garje, MD.

[We initially] had monotherapy options with olaparib (Lynparza) and rucaparib (Rubraca). Now we have emerging combination options with PARP inhibitors. Specifically, there’s the combination of enzalutamide (Xtandi) and talazoparib (Talzenna), and there are also the combinations of olaparib and abiraterone acetate (Zytiga) and niraparib (Zejula) and abiraterone acetate.

Please discuss the TALAPRO-2 study of enzalutamide and talazoparib.

TALAPRO-2 was primarily evaluating the combination of the PARP inhibitor talazoparib with enzalutamide in patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer in first-line setting. Most of the patients were antiandrogen–naive, or they could have received anti-androgens in the past but not progressed on it, because nowadays we use anti androgens in the adjuvant setting for high-risk patients after a surgery or radiation therapy. In this study, the patients included were both HRR-positive and -negative and we clearly showed that the benefit was for HRR-positive patients, and specifically, benefit was seen for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutated patients.

The overall survival data are still immature and with regards to the benefit, what we have seen is primarily in radiographic progression-free survival. The hazard ratios were significant where patients who had her HRR-deficient tumors, which included a spectrum of not only BRCA1 and BRCA2, but additional mutations that all had a radiographic progression-free survival benefit compared with patients who received placebo with enzalutamide. Based on these study results, the FDA [recently] approved the combination for patients with HRR-mutated or -deficient metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Can you discuss some of the PROpel study findings?

The PROpel study was also in the similar space of patients with metastatic castration-resistant and they were in the first line of treatment with similar cohorts of patients who had HRR-mutant and non-mutant disease. In this study, the combination therapy was with olaparib along with abiraterone. We saw that there was, again, survival benefit primarily with BRCA-mutated patients, and also with other HRR-mutated patients. There was no benefit seen in filled [patients] with non HRR-mutated patients.

Based on these data, which required little bit additional evaluation when FDA was reviewing it, especially in the ODAC committee, upon deep review of this information, BRCA1- and BRCA2-mutated patients were found to have real benefit with this combination therapy. There were a lot of discussions about other mutations other than BRCA1 and BRCA2, but at the end, the FDA decided to approve it, specifically for BRCA-mutated patients. This is an exciting option for our patients and adds additional options for patients with advanced metastatic prostate cancer.

What are some of the treatment considerations when using PARP inhibitors for these patients? Who's best suited for these therapies?

One important thing is the patients need to be tested. That is the first step to consider these choices, because we have evidence to show that the patients with advanced prostate cancer are not getting next-generation sequencing for identification of these mutations. That is the first task for physicians, to test their patients to see if they have any of these mutations so that they can benefit with the combination therapy.

My goal has been to get all my patients who have advanced prostate cancer, metastatic prostate cancer, to make sure they get the next-generation sequencing to see if they have any of these HRR mutations. Now, if they didn't receive anti-androgen therapy during their castration-sensitive phase, for sure this is a combination therapy that should be considered. We recommend checking BRCA1/2 and other HRR mutations. It's difficult to pick between the 3 options which are currently available, that is with either niraparib, enzalutamide, or olaparib combinations. All 3 are unique PARP inhibitors. They may have nuances that partner drugs are different, so sometimes it depends upon access, it depends upon potential toxicities that the patients are willing to take are avoided, and at the same time, drug interactions. There may be some drug interactions, which may favor 1 drug over another drug. So those are the different clinical considerations because we don't have to add clinical trial comparison of all these combinations. We do utilize 1 of these agents based on these aspects of availability, access, insurance approval, drug interactions, and what [adverse events] we want to avoid for our patients.

When the patients are on the combination therapies, specifically with PARP inhibitors, we do know they are known to be myelosuppressive, especially when we identify these changes to happen in the initial 3 months of therapy. It's critical to keep a close eye on the white blood cells, hemoglobin, and platelets so that we ensure that they don't seriously decline on those numbers and do appropriate supportive care for those reductions or modifications to ensure better tolerability. That is 1 critical thing, but definitely the big goal is to make sure we present this as an option for patients who are entering into the first-line setting of metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer so that they get the best outcomes for the cancer.

What insights do you have on managing adverse events with PARP inhibitors?

The 3 to 4 main things we look into are that we keep track of the blood counts. If there is a significant drop in hemoglobin, we do recommend some temporary treatment breaks and transmission as appropriate. That is 1 important aspect. Then the same thing with platelet counts. There is a significant drop. We do recommend reductions as appropriate based on the grade of the drop in the platelets. The other thing, if the patients have appetite changes or nausea, or vomiting, is appropriate supportive care for that. Some patients may notice minor elevation in creatine. It may not specifically be due to worsening renal function, but it's just due to the mechanism the way these drugs work. Ensuring hydration and then close monitoring.

For all the PARP inhibitors in the initial 2 to 3 months, we do recommend checking blood work, including complete blood counts, kidney function, and liver function at least every 2 weeks for the first 2 or 3 months to make sure they're all in normal range or if they are affected, then do more close monitoring based on the situation.

What ongoing research is looking to further advance PARP inhibitors in prostate cancer?

PARP inhibitors are now being explored with other agents beyond androgen receptor pathway inhibitors, such as in combinations with chemotherapy and with theranostic agents. It is definitely exciting.

This transcript was edited for clarity.

Recent Videos
DNA | Image Credit: © BillionPhotos.com - stock.adobe.com
Adri Durant, MD, and Mouneeb Choudry, MD, answer a question during a Zoom video interview
DNA helix | Image Credit: © Siarhei - stock.adobe.com
DNA strands | Image Credit: ©  Matthieu - stock.adobe.com
Keyan Salari, MD, PhD, answers a question during a Zoom video interview
Dr. Neal Shore in an interview with Urology Times
Related Content
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.