• Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
  • Hormone Therapy
  • Genomic Testing
  • Next-Generation Imaging
  • UTUC
  • OAB and Incontinence
  • Genitourinary Cancers
  • Kidney Cancer
  • Men's Health
  • Pediatrics
  • Female Urology
  • Sexual Dysfunction
  • Kidney Stones
  • Urologic Surgery
  • Bladder Cancer
  • Benign Conditions
  • Prostate Cancer

How number of Peyronie’s Tx cycles affects outcomes


In a study of intralesional collagenase clostridium histolyticum, mean curvature was reduced most dramatically after the first cycle, researchers reported.

Findings of a retrospective review of men receiving intralesional collagenase clostridium histolyticum (CCH; Xiaflex) for Peyronie’s disease may help inform therapeutic decisions on number of cycles.

Also from AUA 2016: Data weigh neuromodulation’s impact on QoL at 3 years

Conducted by researchers at Tulane University School of Medicine in New Orleans, the study analyzed serial and total changes in penile curvature in 77 men, of whom 41 (53%) completed four cycles of CCH treatment (eight total injections). The findings were presented at the AUA annual meeting in San Diego.

Overall, mean curvature decreased significantly from 58.2° at baseline to 41.0° after the last cycle of injections. Comparing men who achieved a ≥20° change from baseline to those with less curvature reduction based on a number of variables showed the two groups differed significantly only in the amount of curvature reduction achieved after the first treatment cycle (–16.2° vs. –5.9°, respectively; p<.001).

Have you read: AS success rate strong in appropriate PCa patients

Analysis of change in penile curvature after each injection cycle was done using a repeated measures model. It showed mean curvature was reduced most dramatically after the first cycle (–12.0°), and there was continued improvement between the second and third and third and fourth sets of injections (mean reduction of –4.6° and –4.8°, respectively). However, there was essentially no significant change in penile curvature as a result of the fourth cycle, said first author James Anaissie.

Next: “Our study indicates that urologists may counsel patients who have a strong response to the first cycle that they are likely to have a better final outcome"


“CCH can be an effective treatment for Peyronie’s disease, but the response is variable, it is expensive, and the injections are painful,” he said.

Also see: Study finds prostate Ca clones trackable by fusion biopsy

“Our study indicates that urologists may counsel patients who have a strong response to the first cycle that they are likely to have a better final outcome, so they may feel more confident about continuing. On the other hand, men who had a more modest change in curvature could be told they may still achieve significant benefit with further cycles, but that they are less likely to have a bigger response at the end.”

Senior author Wayne JG Hellstrom, MD, noted that four CCH cycles has become standard of care for treating Peyronie’s disease because it was the regimen used in the large Investigation for Maximal Peyronie's Reduction Efficacy and Safety Studies (IMPRESS). The findings of this retrospective study, however, call the four-cycle protocol into question.

“What constitutes the optimal number of CCH cycles has not been systematically investigated. Our study does not provide conclusive data to state definitively that a fourth cycle is not effective,” Dr. Hellstrom said.

In addition to change in curvature after the first cycle, the variables analyzed as possible predictors of final curvature reduction ≥20° included patient age, duration of Peyronie’s disease, pretreatment curvature, curvature direction, degree of fibrosis, vascular findings from duplex Doppler examination, and number of treatment cycles. Aside from response to the first cycle, none of the factors was found to differ significantly comparing men with a final curvature reduction ≥20° with those having a lesser response.

Dr. Hellstrom was lead investigator for the IMPRESS trials and is a speaker for Endo Pharmaceuticals.

More from AUA 2016:

Transfusion’s effects examined in RP patients

Water ablation’s safety, efficiency in BPH assessed

Dusting vs. basketing: Which method is better?

To get weekly news from the leading news source for urologists, subscribe to the Urology Times eNews.

Related Videos
Man talking with doctor, who is taking notes on a clipboard | Image Credit: © DragonImages - stock.adobe.com
Peter N. Tsambarlis, MD, answers a question during a Zoom video interview
Doctor talking with patient | Image Credit: © Pcess609 - stock.adobe.com
Dr. Landon Trost in an interview with Urology Times
Dr. Thairo Pereira in an interview with Urology Times
Related Content
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.