"Our preliminary clinical trial found that TAR-200 was generally safe, well tolerated, and had beneficial effects on bladder cancer outcomes in a group of patients with limited treatment options," said Mark Tyson, MD, MPH.
A new intravesical chemotherapy delivery system called TAR-200 was found to be safe and tolerable for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) who refused or were unfit for curative-intent therapy, according to findings from a phase 1 study (NCT03404791). The data were published in the Journal of Urology.1,2
TAR-200 works by providing continuous low-doses of localized gemcitabine via insertion into the bladder. The phase 1 TAR-200-103 study assessed the feasibility of the device in patients with advanced bladder cancer.
"Our preliminary clinical trial found that TAR-200 was generally safe, well tolerated, and had beneficial effects on bladder cancer outcomes in a group of patients with limited treatment options," said lead author Mark Tyson, MD, MPH, in a news release on the findings.2 Tyson is a urologic oncologist at Mayo Clinic in Phoenix, Arizona.
The multicenter, open-label, single-arm study enrolled 35 patients who had cT2-cT3bN0M0 urothelial carcinoma. Median age among the participants was 84 years, and 68.6% were male. Patients received therapy with TAR-200 for up to 84 days, broken up into 4 21-day cycles. Primary end points of the study were safety and tolerability.
In regard to safety, 15 patients had treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) related to TAR-200, and 2 patients had TEAEs that led to removal of the device. The most common TEAEs were dysuria and urinary frequency. In total, 1 patient had a TEAE that led to treatment discontinuation.
At 3-month follow-up, the complete response rate was 31.4% (11 patients) and the partial response rate was 8.6% (3 patients), which yielded an overall response rate of 40%. Median overall survival was 27.3 months, and the duration of response was 14 months.
Progression-free rate was 92.3% at 6 months and 70.5% at 12 months among the 14 patients with lasting responses to the treatment. Median time to disease progression was 13.5 months and median progression-free survival was 9.5 months.
"Overall, the observed clinical response to TAR-200 was robust and durable in a cohort with very limited curative-intent treatment options,” said the authors, indicating that the results warrant further study of the device.
Currently, TAR-200 is being assessed in combination with the systemic inhibitor of programmed cell death protein-1 cetrelimab in the SunRISe clinical trial program (NCT04640623, NCT04658862, NCT04919512).
References
1. Tyson MD, Morris D, Palou J, et al. Safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of TAR-200 in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer who refused or were unfit for curative-intent therapy: a phase 1 study. Journal of Urology. Published online April 7, 2023. Accessed April 10, 2023. doi:10.1097/JU.0000000000003195.
2. Sustained-release chemotherapy gives new options for frail patients with invasive bladder cancer. News release. Wolters Kluwer Health: Lippincott. April 7, 2023. Accessed April 10, 2023. https://www.newswise.com/articles/sustained-release-chemotherapy-gives-new-option-for-frail-patients-with-invasive-bladder-cancer?sc=mwhr&xy=10016681
Advancing bladder cancer care: The importance of integrating mental health support
September 9th 2024"I think the fact that we're having these conversations, that they are being talked about at national meetings, and that we are bringing the patient voice into this is hugely important," says Mary W. Dunn, MSN, NP-C, OCN, RN.
Speaking of Urology Podcast: Dr. Ritch and Dr. Katz discuss new bladder cancer management app
December 7th 2021“It's not a replacement for clinical judgment, obviously. But at the end of the day, the idea is that it shows you what your next steps are based on what the American Urological Association and [Society of Urologic Oncology] guidelines are for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer,” Chad R. Ritch, MD, MBA, FACS.