These videos demonstrate the difference in anatomic approach between a single penoscrotal and double perineal/penoscrotal incision technique for simultaneous placement of the inflatable penile prosthesis and artificial urinary sphincter.
In this video, we demonstrate the two-incision approach for simultaneous placement of the inflatable penile prosthesis and artificial urinary sphincter. The two-incision approach is a comparable alternative to the single upper-transverse scrotal incision approach.
This video illustrates the single-incision approach for the simultaneous placement of the inflatable penile prosthesis and artificial urinary sphincter.
Dr. Brant: Dr. Jones’s videos demonstrate the difference in anatomic approach between a single penoscrotal and double perineal/penoscrotal incision technique. The single-incision technique has become less popular due to difficulties in placing the artificial sphincter cuff in an appropriately proximal location. The double incision allows for direct dissection over a variety of locations of the bulbar urethra; with proper retraction, the distal to mid bulbar urethra may be used with a single incision.
IPP: Penoscrotal IPP placement with ventral phalloplasty
IPP: Ventral phalloplasty and IPP placement
IPP: Semi-rigid prosthesis placed via subcoronal approach
IPP: Retractor-less approach to IPP placement
Erectile dysfunction: Multiple treatment options
Subscribe to Urology Times to get monthly news from the leading news sources for urologists.
Study suggests broader use of anastrozole for male infertility
September 28th 2023If replicated with further study, the finding potentially expands noninvasive fertility treatment options and may minimize the need for expensive reproductive technology, according to lead author Scott D. Lundy, MD, PhD, of Cleveland Clinic’s Department of Urology.