© 2020 MJH Life Sciences™ and Urology Times. All rights reserved.
IPP: Approaches to prosthesis and AUS placement
These videos demonstrate the difference in anatomic approach between a single penoscrotal and double perineal/penoscrotal incision technique for simultaneous placement of the inflatable penile prosthesis and artificial urinary sphincter.
In this video, we demonstrate the two-incision approach for simultaneous placement of the inflatable penile prosthesis and artificial urinary sphincter. The two-incision approach is a comparable alternative to the single upper-transverse scrotal incision approach.
IPP: Prosthesis and AUS placement: Single-incision approach
This video illustrates the single-incision approach for the simultaneous placement of the inflatable penile prosthesis and artificial urinary sphincter.
Dr. Brant: Dr. Jones’s videos demonstrate the difference in anatomic approach between a single penoscrotal and double perineal/penoscrotal incision technique. The single-incision technique has become less popular due to difficulties in placing the artificial sphincter cuff in an appropriately proximal location. The double incision allows for direct dissection over a variety of locations of the bulbar urethra; with proper retraction, the distal to mid bulbar urethra may be used with a single incision.
| James M. Hotaling, MD, MS, Section Editor | Dr. Hotaling is assistant professor of surgery (urology) at the |
More 'Y'tube videos
IPP: Penoscrotal IPP placement with ventral phalloplasty
IPP: Ventral phalloplasty and IPP placement
IPP: Semi-rigid prosthesis placed via subcoronal approach
IPP: Retractor-less approach to IPP placement
Erectile dysfunction: Multiple treatment options
Subscribe to Urology Times to get monthly news from the leading news sources for urologists.