Article

Re-TURBT prior to cystectomy has similar pathologic upstaging rates regardless of NAC status

The investigators found that the overall upstaging rate from re-TURBT to RC was 34.9%, with 31.0% upstaged in the NAC group and 37.0% in the no-NAC group (P = .584).

Restaging transurethral bladder resection of the tumor (TURBT) prior to radical cystectomy (RC) with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is associated with similar rates of pathologic upstaging, investigators reported at the 2021 Society of Urologic Oncology Annual Meeting.1

For the study, presented by first author Justin Mehr, BS, of Baylor College of Medicine Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center in Houston, Texas, the investigators compared staging accuracy between re-TURBT clinical stage and pathologic stage in patients who underwent a post-NAC re-TURBT prior to RC vs those who underwent a re-TURBT prior to RC but did not receive NAC.

The investigators used a prospectively maintained, internal review board-approved institutional database for the study and identified 129 patients who underwent RC between 2013 and 2019 with a re-TURBT prior to RC. Of these patients, 53 received NAC between their initial and re-TURBT and 76 patients did not receive NAC.

Median patient age at RC was 69.5 years. Most of the patients (107, 82.9%) were men, and 121 (93.8%) were White.

The investigators found that the overall upstaging rate from re-TURBT to RC was 34.9%, with 31.0% upstaged in the NAC group and 37.0% in the no-NAC group (P = .584).

Looking at patients who showed absence of residual disease (cT0, n = 21), “We found there was no difference in the rate of absence of tumor on pathologic staging, with 38.5% for the NAC group and 37.5% for no-NAC group [P = 1.0],” Mehr said.

The investigators also looked at re-TURBT with staging less than rT2 as a predictor for absence of muscle-invasive bladder cancer on pathologic staging. They found there was no significant difference between the groups, with negative predictive values of 69.0% and 66.7% for the NAC and no-NAC groups, respectively (P = .083).

Mehr reported that all patients who were node positive on initial TURBT were pathologic stage T2 or greater following chemotherapy and re-TURBT (n = 7), and that out of patients who were clinical stage T1 at post-NAC TURBT, 62.5% were pT2 or higher.

Mehr also noted, “With a high rate of patients who were clinical stage T1 on post-NAC re-TURBT having muscle-invasive bladder cancer on pathologic staging, these patients will be eligible for adjuvant immunotherapy with nivolumab [Opdivo] and clinical trial testing alternative adjuvant regimens.”

“While we have consistently found that one of the best predictors of positive clinical and survival outcomes is pT0 following RC, challenges remain regarding the accuracy of clinical staging with restaging TURBT and [exam under anesthesia]. Clinical trials that are testing bladder preservation in these patients require careful follow-up to determine outcomes relative to the potential for residual bladder cancer and occult disease,” Mehr said in his concluding remarks.

Reference

1. Mehr J, Bates JN, Lerner SP. Benefit of re-staging transurethral resection of bladder tumor prior to radical cystectomy with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Paper presented at: 2021 Society of Urologic Oncology Annual Meeting; December 1-3, Orlando, Florida. Abstract 79. https://suo-abstracts.secure-platform.com/a/gallery/rounds/12/details/1530

Related Videos
Chad Tang, MD: Considerations for SBRT in metastatic RCC
Interpreting ART toxicity and tolerability for bladder cancer, with Vedang Murthy, MD
Alexander Pastuszak, MD, PhD: Is hormone therapy safe after prostate cancer radiotherapy?
Refining prostate cancer therapy strategy to address RAPTOR findings
Considering patient-reported outcomes in kidney cancer care, with Nicholas Zaorsky, MD, PhD
Soumyajit Roy, MS, MBBS: The effect of prostate cancer patient history in RAPTOR
 Nicholas Zaorsky, MD, MS: Protecting kidney function after local renal cell carcinoma therapy
Nicholas van AS, MD, MBBCH: The case for SBRT as a standard of care for localized prostate cancer
Pierre Blanchard, MD, PhD: What can hydrogel space provide to optimal prostate cancer care?
Related Content
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.