• Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
  • Hormone Therapy
  • Genomic Testing
  • Next-Generation Imaging
  • UTUC
  • OAB and Incontinence
  • Genitourinary Cancers
  • Kidney Cancer
  • Men's Health
  • Pediatrics
  • Female Urology
  • Sexual Dysfunction
  • Kidney Stones
  • Urologic Surgery
  • Bladder Cancer
  • Benign Conditions
  • Prostate Cancer

Coding laser ablation, robotic RP: Consider these points


The current CPT terminology does focus specifically on the results of the laser and not the laser itself.

Q. My question concerns coding for prostate laser ablation. The physician performs a Holmium laser ablation of the prostate. Does Holmium ablation always mean coagulation, or can Holmium laser also be used for vaporization? The physician does not use that terminology, and I seem to be at an unlisted CPT code.

Q. I am trying to verify that we are coding laparoscopic robotic prostatectomy correctly. I spoke with our local Medicare carrier representative last week and was told to use the unlisted code 55899 for the primary surgeon and use 55866/80 for the assistant. We have been using the unlisted code for both the primary and the assistant surgeons, and the assistant surgeon's claims have all been denied. We have appealed these denials, but do not know the outcome yet.

Q. How do I charge for the new TargetScan 3-D prostate needle biopsy?

If you are doing the "saturation biopsy" or "prostate mapping" as defined by the tracking code 0137T, you are required to charge that code instead of the prostatic needle biopsy (55700) and the ultrasound guidance (76947) codes. Remember that you have to negotiate the payment for that code as you do for an unlisted code, since there is no payment attached in the Medicare fee schedule.

Q. I just recently read your article about using the 1995 E&M documentation guidelines rather than the 1997 guidelines (Urology Times, October 2005). I printed off both physical exam forms, but I am confused on the meaning of the term "elements" in the 1995 guidelines. A limited exam requires that one to three elements be examined and documented for the affected organ system. Does this mean that if the physician examines one organ (eg, DRE) listed on the form, he could choose a level 3 for the PE portion?

A. The 1995 guidelines do not have listed elements or proscribed counts per se; the interpretation of one to three elements is based on the definition of "limited" in the history section of the guidelines. Thus, one element on the affected organ system is sufficient for a limited affected organ system examination.

Related Videos
Diverse doctors having a conversation |  Image Credit: © Flamingo Images - stock.adobe.com
Close up interviewer interview candidate apply for job at meeting room in office | Image Credit: © weedezign - stock.adobe.com
Alexandra Tabakin, MD, answers a question during a Zoom video interview
Anne M. Suskind, MD, MS, FACS, FPMRS, answers a question during a Zoom video interview
African American doctor having headache while reading an e-mail on laptop | Image Credit: © Drazen - stock.adobe.com
Related Content
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.