Epigenetic test may cut unneeded repeat PCa biopsies

Article

Two independent published trials have validated the performance of an epigenetic test that could provide physicians with a better tool to help eliminate unnecessary repeat prostate biopsies.

Two independent published trials have validated the performance of an epigenetic test that could provide physicians with a better tool to help eliminate unnecessary repeat prostate biopsies.

In the previously reported independent MATLOC (Methylation Analysis To Locate Occult Cancer) trial, a multiplex epigenetic assay (ConfirmMDx for Prostate Cancer, MDxHealth SA, Irvine, CA) profiling the APC, GSTP1, and RASSF1 genes demonstrated a negative predictive value of 90% (J Urol 2013; 189:1110–6)GSTP1 methylation is a specific biomarker for prostate cancer, and APC and RASSF1 are important field effect markers and increase the diagnostic sensitivity of the assay.

Related - Genomic test helps guide decisions on RT after RP

A more recent multicenter study, DOCUMENT (Detection Of Cancer Using Methylated Events in Negative Tissue), has validated the performance of the assay as an independent predictor of prostate cancer risk to guide decision making for repeat biopsy. In the DOCUMENT study, patients with a negative biopsy were evaluated to identify those at low risk for harboring cancer missed, through biopsy sampling error, who could forego an unnecessary repeat biopsy. The validation study resulted in a negative predictive value of 88%.

Results of the DOCUMENT study were published online in the Journal of Urology (April 16, 2014) in advance of the October 2014 issue.

“This epigenetic assay is a significant, independent predictor and has been shown to be the most valuable diagnostic aid of all evaluated risk factors in two independent trials,” said first author Alan W. Partin, MD, PhD, of Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore. “Negative findings of this assay could be used to reduce concern over unsampled cancer and effectively avoid unnecessary repeat biopsies.”

A total of 350 patients were enrolled in the DOCUMENT trial from five centers: Cleveland Clinic, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Lahey Hospital & Medical Center, Johns Hopkins, and UCLA. Patients were grouped into those with two consecutive negative biopsies (controls) and those with a negative biopsy followed by a positive biopsy within 24 months. The initial archived, negative for cancer, prostate biopsy core tissue samples were evaluated. All of the men underwent a repeat biopsy on average 1 year after the initial biopsy.

Only biopsies with a minimum of eight cores per biopsy, collected no earlier than 2007, were included in the study, while initial biopsies with atypical small acinar proliferation were excluded, since this would have triggered a repeat biopsy based upon histopathology alone.

After correcting for age, PSA, digital rectal exam, histopathologic characteristics of the first biopsy, and race, the ConfirmMDx test was found to be the most significant, independent, and strongest predictor of patient outcome with an odds ratio of 2.69 as well as the most valuable diagnostic aid of all evaluated risk factors. The slightly decreased sensitivity of the DOCUMENT trial compared to the MATLOC trial is most likely associated with a higher PSA screening prevalence in the DOCUMENT cohort.

More on Prostate Cancer

Diagnosing docs strongly influence PCa Tx decisions

AUA 2014: Studies shine light on new PCa tests, TRT safety

Best of AUA 2014: Prostate Cancer

To get weekly news from the leading news source for urologists, subscribe to the Urology Times eNews.
 

Related Videos
Video 2 - "Predicting Risk and Guiding Care: Biomarkers & Genetic Testing in Prostate Cancer"
Video 1 - "Metastatic Prostate Cancer: Background and Patient Prognosis"
Prostate cancer, 3D illustration showing presence of tumor inside prostate gland which compresses urethra | Image Credit: © Dr_Microbe - stock.adobe.com
Doctor consulting with patient | Image Credit: © Khunatorn - stock.adobe.com
Scott Morgan, MD, MSc, FRCPC, answers a question during a Zoom video interview
Man talking with a doctor | Image Credit: © Chinnapong - stock.adobe.com
Todd M. Morgan, MD, answers a question during a Zoom video interview
3D illustration of prostate cancer cells | Image Credit: © Dr_Microbe - stock.adobe.com
Brian T. Helfand, MD, and Matthew Smith, MD, PhD, experts on prostate cancer
Brian T. Helfand, MD, and Matthew Smith, MD, PhD, experts on prostate cancer
Related Content
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.