Nivolumab (Opdivo) is the second in class of immune checkpoint inhibitors approved for advanced bladder cancer-treatments that are having “tremendous responses across a spectrum of cancers,” says Leonard G. Gomella, MD.
The FDA has approved nivolumab (Opdivo) injection for intravenous use for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma.
Also see: Urology FDA approvals of 2016
Bristol-Myers Squibb said that the approval covers treatment of patients who have disease progression during or following platinum-containing chemotherapy or have disease progression within 12 months of neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment with platinum-containing chemotherapy.
“Urologists are familiar with Opdivo as it was approved in 2015 for advanced renal cell carcinoma. The drug has indications in at least four other cancers including melanoma, lung cancer, head and neck cancers, and Hodgkin’s lymphoma,” Leonard G. Gomella, MD, of Jefferson Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, told Urology Times. “Other checkpoint inhibitors have also demonstrated utility in advanced urothelial carcinoma trials and are very likely to follow in this disease state.”
Nivolumab is the second in class of immune checkpoint inhibitors approved for advanced bladder cancer. Tecentriq (atezolizumab) was the first PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitor approved by the FDA (in May 2016) for advanced urothelial carcinoma.
The nivolumab approval came following positive results from CheckMate-275, a phase II, open-label, single-arm, multicenter study evaluating 270 patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. In that study, 19.6% of patients responded to treatment with nivolumab, consisting of 2.6% of patients with a complete response and 17% of patients with a partial response. Among responders, the median duration of response was 10.3 months and the median time to response was 1.9 months.
The recommended dose for mUC is 240 mg, administered as an intravenous infusion over an hour every 2 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Next: FDA approval accelerated thanks to strong beneficial tumor response rate and duration observed in phase III clinical trial
The FDA approval was accelerated thanks to a strong beneficial tumor response rate and duration observed in a phase III clinical trial.
Read - Uro Pipeline: FDA accepts biologics license application for bladder Ca agent
Dr. Gomella noted that the current approvals for checkpoint inhibitors in bladder cancer are specific for situations such as advanced urothelial carcinoma that failed platinum-based chemotherapy or worsening of disease in certain time frames in the setting of neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy.
“These immune checkpoint inhibitors are having tremendous responses across a spectrum of cancers beyond the GU system,” he said. “At the present time, these agents are primarily administered by medical oncologists and can cause unique immune-mediated side effects such as pneumonitis, colitis, nephritis, and others that can be challenging to manage.”
Bristol-Myers Squibb reported that the new indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in confirmatory trials.
“Most people don’t know how common bladder cancer is and that it is the fifth most diagnosed cancer,” Stephanie Chisolm, of Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network, said in a Bristol-Myers Squibb press release. “That’s why we are dedicated to raising awareness and supporting research efforts that may offer more treatment options to patients who need them. This approval is another exciting step forward for the bladder cancer community and provides needed hope to patients and their families.”
Dr. Gomella is a consultant or adviser for Astellas, Janssen, MDxHealth, Merck Pharmaceuticals, and Bayer.
Redefining the culture of NP-physician collaboration
Post-RT proctitis less likely in ACE inhibitor users
To get weekly news from the leading news source for urologists, subscribe to the Urology Times eNews.
Advancing bladder cancer care: The importance of integrating mental health support
September 9th 2024"I think the fact that we're having these conversations, that they are being talked about at national meetings, and that we are bringing the patient voice into this is hugely important," says Mary W. Dunn, MSN, NP-C, OCN, RN.
Speaking of Urology Podcast: Dr. Ritch and Dr. Katz discuss new bladder cancer management app
December 7th 2021“It's not a replacement for clinical judgment, obviously. But at the end of the day, the idea is that it shows you what your next steps are based on what the American Urological Association and [Society of Urologic Oncology] guidelines are for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer,” Chad R. Ritch, MD, MBA, FACS.