Kenton H. Steele, Esq, on the issues addressed by expert witnesses in medical malpractice litigation

"All the components of the trial are designed to try to ensure that when the jurors depart for the deliberation room, they are inclined to find for the attorney’s side in the case," writes Austin Richards, Esq.

“Their opinions do need to be credible and be honest, but there is some component of being able to walk a line between providing a candid, unbiased opinion, and knowing that you are retained to represent a specific side in that case,” says Kenton H. Steele, Esq.

"In the 21st century, expert witnesses serve a vital role in presenting evidence to a jury. A good expert will be able to distill complex information into digestible elements the jurors can understand," writes Austin Richards, Esq.

“I think it's the responsibility of the physician to really take on educating and counseling and setting clear expectations and that way, when complications do arise, patients are better equipped, and they have a more favorable outcome,” says Ariana Matz, MD.

"To form a connection between the witness and the jury and establish the witness’ credibility, the witness needs to be the star," writes Austin M. Richards, Esq.

"An attorney who just reads off a script spewing random facts at the jury will likely cause the jurors to check out," writes Kenton H. Steele, Esq.