MIBC: Bladder sparing warrants careful consideration

Article

“I think it’s time to realize that there are other options besides cystectomy, and that the other options should at least be discussed and entertained,” says Alexandre Zlotta, MD, PhD, in this video.

Bladder-sparing treatments, including trimodal therapy, should be carefully considered as alternatives to cystectomy in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC).

That was the key take-home message of Alexandre Zlotta, MD, PhD, of Mount Sinai Hospital and the University of Toronto, who spoke at the Society of Urologic Oncology annual meeting in Phoenix.

In this video, Dr. Zlotta talks to Urology Times about involving MIBC patients in the treatment decision, how to monitor patients undergoing bladder preservation, and the importance of a specialized, multidisciplinary center in a bladder preservation program.

“I think it’s time to realize that there are other options besides cystectomy, and that the other options should at least be discussed and entertained,” Dr. Zlotta said.

Dr. Zlotta is a consultant for Ferring, Sanofi-Aventis, 3D Biopsy, and Sanofi-Pasteur.

Recent Videos
Alexander Pastuszak, MD, PhD: Is hormone therapy safe after prostate cancer radiotherapy?
Refining prostate cancer therapy strategy to address RAPTOR findings
Considering patient-reported outcomes in kidney cancer care, with Nicholas Zaorsky, MD, PhD
Soumyajit Roy, MS, MBBS: The effect of prostate cancer patient history in RAPTOR
 Nicholas Zaorsky, MD, MS: Protecting kidney function after local renal cell carcinoma therapy
Nicholas van AS, MD, MBBCH: The case for SBRT as a standard of care for localized prostate cancer
Pierre Blanchard, MD, PhD: What can hydrogel space provide to optimal prostate cancer care?
Savita Dandapani, MD, PhD: Findings from the phase 2 SHARP trial
Related Content
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.