Prostate biopsy: The old way is better and safer

Article

I never joined the transrectal biopsy herd. I stuck with the perineal biopsy, which has been proven in a head-to-head trial to have a better yield of cancer.

Regarding the article, "Studies point to significant risks of prostate biopsy" (October 2010, page 1): I never joined the transrectal biopsy herd. I stuck with the perineal biopsy, which has been proven in a head-to-head trial to have a better yield of cancer.

Dipping a needle in feces and then putting it into the sterile prostate seemed unwise to me. Anybody can find five infectious deaths in 30 seconds by typing into PubMed "prostate biopsy death." In my book, "The Big Scare: The Business of Prostate Cancer," I calculate 947 deaths from prostate biopsy in the 1984-1997 period.

Dr. Nam's project to improve the transrectal protocol because of all the complications he reported is ill-conceived. He and all other urologists should return to the perineal biopsy of hard nodules identified by a simultaneous finger in the rectum. Sometimes the old way is better, safer. "Vox clamantis in deserto."

Related Videos
Leonardo Kayat Bittencourt, MD, PhD, answers a question during a Zoom video interview
blur image background of corridor in hospital or clinic image | Image Credit @ whyframeshot - stock.adobe.com
Male and female surgeon performing surgery | Image Credit: © Georgii - stock.adobe.com
 Licensed   FILE #:  458906503  Preview Crop  Find Similar  Expand Image DIMENSIONS 8000 x 5333px FILE TYPE JPEG CATEGORY The Environment LICENSE TYPE Standard or Extended A lake in the shape of a recycling sign in the middle of untouched nature | Image Credit: © malp - stock.adobe.com
Dr. Mehmet Asim Bilen in an interview with Urology Times
Anne M. Suskind, MD, MS, FACS, FPMRS, answers a question during a Zoom video interview
Related Content
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.