• Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
  • Hormone Therapy
  • Genomic Testing
  • Next-Generation Imaging
  • UTUC
  • OAB and Incontinence
  • Genitourinary Cancers
  • Kidney Cancer
  • Men's Health
  • Pediatrics
  • Female Urology
  • Sexual Dysfunction
  • Kidney Stones
  • Urologic Surgery
  • Bladder Cancer
  • Benign Conditions
  • Prostate Cancer

RCC sequencing: One good answer

Article

The take-home message is that for sorafenib and sunitinib, sequencing does not appear to be drug dependent and either can be used as first- or second-line therapy.

Leonard G. Gomella, MD
Dr. Gomella,

Molecularly targeted therapy has become standard treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Many new agents such as axitinib (Inlyta), everolimus (Afinitor), pazopanib (Votrient), sorafenib (Nexavar), sunitinib (Sutent), and temsirolimus (Torisel) are now approved for this indication. These agents inhibit either vascular endothelial growth factor or tyrosine kinase pathways.

Sorafenib and sunitinib are the most commonly used oral agents for metastatic RCC. The optimum sequence of these two agents has not been prospectively studied.

The SWITCH trial presented at the 2014 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium studied the sequencing of either sorafenib or sunitinib as first- or second-line therapy. The order did not affect progression-free or overall survival for patients with metastatic RCC. Adverse events were as expected, although there was a suggestion that side effects were less with second-line use of either drug. The SWITCH trial was designed to demonstrate that one of the sequences would be superior. While results failed to demonstrate superiority of either, the trial did answer an important sequencing question.

This challenge of optimum sequencing is not unique to RCC. We face similar challenges with multiple new agents available for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

The take-home message is that for sorafenib and sunitinib, sequencing does not appear to be drug dependent and either can be used as first- or second-line therapy. This study also demonstrated an overall survival of 30 months, one of the highest reported in this disease state.

While these newer targeted therapies have become the “go-to” drugs for advanced disease, immunotherapy remains a viable option for many patients. As we embrace targeted therapies, the fact that immunotherapy can induce long-term complete remissions in up to 10% of patients is something not seen with these newer agents. More work is needed in terms of sequencing all targeted and traditional immunotherapies in advanced RCC. For now, SWITCH suggests either sorafenib or sunitinib can be considered as initial therapy with either a reasonable second-line choice.UT

 

Like this article? Check out these other recent Urology Times articles:

Robotic nephrectomy on the rise, but why?

Robotic partial nephrectomy: Renal function loss low in CKD patients

Agent shows promise in slowing papillary kidney cancer

Subscribe to Urology Times to get monthly news from the leading news source for urologists.

                                                                                                                                    

Related Videos
Human kidney cross section on scientific background | © Crystal light - stock.adobe.com
Jaleh Fallah, MD, answers a question during a Zoom video interview
Human kidney cross section on science background | Image Credit: © Rasi - stock.adobe.com
Human kidney cross section on science background | Image Credit: © Crystal light - stock.adobe.com
Blur image of hospital corridor | Image Credit: © zephyr_p - stock.adobe.com
Laura Bukavina, MD, MPH, answers a question during a Zoom video interview
Neal Shore, MD, FACS, and Brian M. Shuch, MD, experts on kidney cancer
Neal Shore, MD, FACS, and Brian M. Shuch, MD, experts on kidney cancer
Neal Shore, MD, FACS, and Brian M. Shuch, MD, experts on kidney cancer
Neal Shore, MD, FACS, and Brian M. Shuch, MD, experts on kidney cancer
Related Content
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.