SBRT safety noninferior to conventional radiotherapy in prostate cancer

SBRT toxicity similar to conventional l radiotherapy toxicity in prostate cancer.

At 24 months, grade ≥2 GU toxicities occurred in 2% of those receiving conventional radiotherapy vs 3% of those treated with SBRT.

Two-year follow-up data from the phase 3 PACE-B trial (NCT01584258) showed that five fraction stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has noninferior toxicity and is delivered over a much shorter time period versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy in patients with prostate cancer.1

At 24 months, Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) grade 2 or worse genitourinary (GU) toxicities—one of the study’s co-primary end points—occurred in 2% of those receiving control radiotherapy compared with 3% of those in the SBRT cohort. Moreover, RTOG grade 2 or worse gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities were observed in 3% of those in the control radiotherapy cohort and 2% of those in the SBRT cohort.

A total of 874 patients enrolled in the open-label trial. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either conventional radiotherapy (n = 441) or SBRT (n = 433). Patients in the control group received 78 Gy in 39 fractions over 7.8 weeks or 62 Gy in 20 fractions over 4 weeks. In the other cohort, patients received 36.25 Gy of SBRT in 5 fractions over 1 to 2 weeks.

Patients were eligible to participate in the study if they had a World Health Oorganization performance status of 0 to 2, low-risk or intermediate-risk histologically-confirmed prostate adenocarcinoma, and at least 10 biopsy cores taken up to 18 months prior to randomization.

Secondary end points for the trial included the cumulative incidence of RTOG grade 2 or worse GU and GI toxicity up to 24 months, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade 2 or worse erectile dysfunction, and other CTCAE parameters such as hot flashes, fatigue, anorexia, weight loss, and radiation dermatitis.

At baseline, the patient median age was 69.7 years (range, 65.6-74.0) for the control radiotherapy cohort and 69.6 years (range, 65.4-73.8) for the SBRT group. Most patients in each respective arm had T2c tumors (39% vs 36%). Moreover, most patients in the control radiotherapy and SBRT arms, respectively, had National Comprehensive Cancer Network intermediate-risk prostate cancer, (90% vs 92%) and Gleason scores of 3+4 (80% vs 85%).

The trial prospectively included a subgroup analysis comparing patients who received SBRT using robotic non-coplanar radiotherapy (CyberKnife) compared with conventional linear accelerator (linac). Differences in CTCAE GU toxicity profile for robotic non-coplanar radiotherapy and conventional linac were seen in dysuria, incontinence, and retention of CTCAE elements; however, the differences were small. Differences between control radiotherapy delivered by robotic non-coplanar radiotherapy and linac were not significant. CTCAE grade 2 or worse GU incidents were observed in 4% of patients who received robotic non-coplanar control radiotherapy and 9% of those given CRT via a conventional linac center. Investigators did not observe any serious adverse effects (AEs) or any treatment-related deaths within during the analysis.


1. Tree AC, Ostler P, van der Voet H, et al. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus stereotactic body radiotherapy for prostate cancer (PACE-B): 2-year toxicity results from an open-label, randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol. 2022;23(10):P1308-1320. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00517-4

Related Videos
Dr. Mehmet Asim Bilen in an interview with Urology Times
blurred clinic hallway
Dr. Adam Weiner in an interview with Urology Times
Dr. Sagar Patel in an interview with Urology Times
Man talking with doctor | Image Credit: © Chinnapong -
Related Content
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.