Article

Three-gene biomarker predicts prostate cancer progression

The level of expression of three genes associated with aging can be used to predict whether seemingly low-risk prostate cancer will remain slow growing, according to a recent study.

The level of expression of three genes associated with aging can be used to predict whether seemingly low-risk prostate cancer will remain slow growing, according to a recent study.

Use of this three-gene biomarker, in conjunction with existing cancer-staging tests, could help physicians better determine which men with early prostate cancer can be safely followed with active surveillance and spared the risks of prostatectomy or other invasive treatment, researchers say.

Study data were published online in Science Translational Medicine (Sept. 11, 2013).

“Most of the 200,000 prostate cancers diagnosed each year in the U.S. are slow growing and will remain so, but the three-gene biomarker could take much of the guesswork out of the diagnostic process and ensure that patients are neither overtreated nor undertreated,” said co-senior author Cory Abate-Shen, PhD, of the Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center at Columbia University Medical Center, New York.

“The problem with existing tests is that we cannot identify the small percentage of slow-growing tumors that will eventually become aggressive and spread beyond the prostate,” said co-author Mitchell C. Benson, MD, PhD.

In their search for a biomarker for slow-growing prostate cancer, Dr. Abate-Shen and her colleagues focused on genes related to aging, particularly those affected by cellular senescence, a natural phenomenon in which older cells cease to divide but remain metabolically active. Cellular senescence is known to play a critical role in tumor suppression in general and has been associated with benign prostate lesions in mouse models and in humans.

Using gene set enrichment analysis, the authors, led by co-senior author Andrea Califano, PhD, identified 19 genes that are enriched in a mouse model of prostate cancer in which the cancers are invariably indolent. They then used a decision-tree learning model, a type of computer algorithm, to identify three genes-FGFR1, PMP22, and CDKN1A-that together can accurately predict the outcome of seemingly low-risk tumors. Tumors that test negative for the biomarker are deemed aggressive.

In a blinded retrospective study, the authors tested the prognostic accuracy of the three-gene panel on initial biopsy specimens from 43 patients who had been monitored for at least 10 years with active surveillance at Columbia. All the patients had first been diagnosed with low-risk prostate cancer (as defined by several measures, including a Gleason score of 6 or less). Of the 43 patients, 14 ultimately developed advanced prostate cancer. All 14 were correctly identified by the test.

“The bottom line is that, at least in our preliminary trial, we were able to accurately predict which patients with low-risk prostate cancer would develop advanced prostate cancer and which ones would not,” said Dr. Abate-Shen.

To get weekly news from the leading news source for urologists, subscribe to the Urology Times eNews.
 

Related Videos
Alexander Pastuszak, MD, PhD: Is hormone therapy safe after prostate cancer radiotherapy?
Refining prostate cancer therapy strategy to address RAPTOR findings
Soumyajit Roy, MS, MBBS: The effect of prostate cancer patient history in RAPTOR
1 KOL is featured in this series.
1 KOL is featured in this series.
Nicholas van AS, MD, MBBCH: The case for SBRT as a standard of care for localized prostate cancer
Pierre Blanchard, MD, PhD: What can hydrogel space provide to optimal prostate cancer care?
Savita Dandapani, MD, PhD: Findings from the phase 2 SHARP trial
A panel of 4 experts on prostate cancer
Benjamin Pockros, MD, MBA, answers a question during a Zoom video interview
Related Content
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.