"The fear of a hypothetical situation should not be used to place restrictions on the life of one of our transgender patients," writes Henry Rosevear, MD.
|Henry Rosevear, MD||Urology Times|
I was in the San Diego airport on the way home from the AUA annual meeting when I noticed signs for the restrooms. To one side was a sign showing a stick-figure man with pants and on the other side a stick-figure woman with a skirt. What caught my eye was the door in the middle, where I expected to find the family restroom (I’ve become facile at locating this one given my troupe of little ones). Instead of a “Family Restroom” sign, this sign included a stick-figure man, a stick-figure woman, and then a stick figure that had one leg in slacks and the other in a skirt.
It was the first time I had seen a restroom specifically designated for the transgender community.
Also by Dr. Rosevear - AUA 2016: Reflections on mentors, MRI fusion, and more
I'll concede that my first reaction was a small chuckle and the thought, "Ahh, California." But I quickly realized that people may have the same reaction getting off a plane in Denver where they immediately see a bright green cross for a recreational marijuana dispensary or even getting off a plane in Las Vegas and seeing a dozen slot machines.
An hour later, as I was waiting for my delayed flight, I thumbed through the AUA program to pull up abstracts of interesting posters or podiums I missed. I came across a section on pediatric urology and more specifically disorders of sexual differentiation, and my thoughts turned back to that restroom. I then went to the AUA website and to the best of my ability, could find no white paper, consensus statement, or policy endorsed by the AUA on bathrooms and the transgender community. That bothered me.
This debate has gained much recent attention after the North Carolina legislature in a special session passed a law that bars people statewide from using bathrooms that do not match the gender listed on their birth certificate. The law was passed in response to a law passed in the city of Charlotte, which provides protections based on sexual orientation, gender expression, and gender identity, including specifically letting transgender people use the public bathrooms that correspond with their gender identity, not necessarily the gender listed on their birth certificate.
Politics aside, and whether or not we even like it, all of us who have gone through a urology residency have spent hours memorizing the steroid pathway and have been grilled on the manifestations and implications of specific inborn errors of metabolism such as congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH). Most of us only had to deal with this in residency, although I'm sure a certain percentage had the pleasure of discussing the topic with a certifying examiner in Dallas-a much more anxiety-provoking scenario.
Further, even small-town plumbers like me have done cystoscopies on women with penises, and we've all been called to the NICU to examine a newborn baby with a severe case of CAH whose gender was nearly impossible to determine-a boy with a small penis and bilaterally undescended testicles or a masculinized girl with clitoromegaly? To this day, I have no idea how physicians decide what gender to write on the birth certificate in situations like that.
Whether or not we like to admit it, there are very few other surgical specialties that have the experience with these patients that urologists do. This is especially true for those dedicated to pediatric urology.
Recommended: Do you ERAS? The future of post-cystectomy care
As I researched this blog post, I found a significant amount of scientifically incorrect information in the public sphere. I believe this is an opportunity. At the least, the AUA or perhaps one of the pediatric urology societies should take this chance to educate the community by offering irrefutable scientific evidence to clear up the numerous misconceptions that exist regarding this topic. They could even go so far as to draft a consensus statement on the transgender community and public restrooms.
I’m not saying this is going to be easy. As a father of four young girls, I understand the legitimate, if hopefully overhyped, concern that people with nefarious intentions could take advantage of a poorly written law about bathroom access to hurt our children. But the fear of a hypothetical situation should not be used to place restrictions on the life of one of our transgender patients.
Common-sense accommodations can be made, and I would hope that urologists could play a small role in this highly controversial topic before the political talking heads make any more of a mess of it.
If anyone else has experience with this situation or has an idea about how to best make our voices heard, please write me at UT@advanstar.com or sign in below to post a comment.
Subscribe to Urology Times to get monthly news from the leading news source for urologists.