The AUA has announced its support for newly introduced legislation designed to address urotrauma, a growing concern among active military personnel and veterans.
The AUA has announced its support for newly introduced legislation designed to address urotrauma, a growing concern among active military personnel and veterans.
The bill, H.R. 1612, which would direct the U.S. Secretary of Defense to establish a commission on urotrauma, was formally introduced by Reps. Brett Guthrie (R-KY), Mike Ross (D-AR), Peter King (R-NY), Mike McIntyre (D-NC), and Steve Stivers (R-OH). The AUA worked closely with lawmakers to draft the legislation.
Urotrauma is a significant issue among active military populations because improvised explosive devices, when detonated, can cause severe trauma to the sexual organs and genitourinary system, according to the AUA. Additionally, the heavy weight of armor and gear can cause strain to the abdominal muscles over time.
H.R. 1612 would establish an Interagency Commission, led by the U.S. Department of Defense, to investigate and advise on the research and action needed to advance this increasingly essential field. The urotrauma legislation includes the following key provisions:
"This bill highlights the importance of urotrauma research and treatment, and specifically addresses the medical needs of our young military service personnel returning from Iraq and Afghanistan," said AUA spokesperson Steven M. Schlossberg, MD, MBA. "Moreover, H.R. 1612 emphasizes the importance of urologic diseases and the federal government’s role in helping to promote the best quality patient care to our military."
Prior paid malpractice claims linked to increased risk of future claims
February 22nd 2023Based on 5- and 10-year study periods, physicians with single or multiple paid medical malpractice claims “were shown to have a greatly elevated risk of having additional paid claims during a future period,” the authors wrote.
Surprise billing regulation stuns providers, rejects congressional intent
November 17th 2021"The AACU joined 1 effort calling for the administration to remove the directive that arbiters anchor their determination to the qualifying payment amount, and instead let them consider all allowable information submitted by the parties to support their offer," says Ross E. Weber of the AACU.