
Adding metastasis-directed therapy to ADT extends PFS in oligometastatic prostate cancer
Key Takeaways
- MDT combined with ADT significantly improved PFS in oligometastatic prostate cancer compared to ADT alone, as demonstrated in the EXTEND trial.
- The trial's combined analysis showed MDT plus ADT improved radiologic PFS and castration resistance-free survival, with no significant differences in overall survival.
Data from the phase 2 EXTEND trial showed that the addition of metastasis-directed therapy to ADT improved measures of systemic disease control.
Adding metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with oligometastatic prostate cancer, according to preliminary data from the phase 2 EXTEND trial (NCT03599765) published in European Urology.1
"The EXTEND trial demonstrated that the addition of MDT with radiation therapy to hormonal therapy improved PFS compared to hormonal therapy alone in patients with oligometastatic (1-5 metastatic lesions) prostate cancer," said co-author Sumit K Subudhi, MD, PhD, in correspondence with Urology Times®. "In addition, the greatest clinical benefit with MDT plus hormonal therapy was observed in patients with evidence of systemic immune response (T cell receptor [TCR] expansion/contraction)."
In total, the trial enrolled 174 patients through clinical trial sites across the US.2 There were 2 arms of the trial, consisting of patients who received continuous ADT (n = 87) and patients who received intermittent ADT (n = 87). Participants in each arm were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive MDT plus ADT (n = 45, continuous; n = 43, intermittent) or ADT alone (n = 42, continuous; n = 44, intermittent).
The primary end point for the trial was PFS, with key secondary end points including radiologic PFS (rPFS) and castration resistance-free survival (CRFS).
Among the patients who received continuous ADT (n = 87), the median follow-up was 31 months. In this cohort, the median PFS was 47 months (95% CI, 30 to NE) among patients who received MDT plus ADT compared with 22 months (95% CI, 13 to NE) among patients who received ADT alone (HR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.23 to 1.08; P = .036). There were no statistically significant differences observed in the trial’s secondary end points in this arm.
The median follow-up for patients in the intermittent ADT arm (n = 87) was 47 months. In this arm, the median PFS was 28.4 months (95% CI, 23.6 to 47.9) with MDT plus ADT vs 15.8 months (95% CI, 14.0 to 22.6) with ADT alone (HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.78; P = .005). rPFS was also significantly longer in the MDT plus ADT arm, with a median rPFS of 34.7 months (95% CI, 27.2 to NE) in the combination arm vs 22.9 months (95% CI, 17.4 to 39.6) in the ADT alone arm (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.29 to 0.96; P = .035).
At the time of the primary analysis, the median overall survival (OS) had not been reached in either arm.
The investigators also conducted a combined analysis, which included data from both the continuous ADT and the intermittent ADT arms. At a median follow-up of 42 months, MDT plus ADT continued to demonstrate significant improvements in PFS vs ADT alone. Specifically, the median PFS was 36 months (95% CI, 27 to 47) with MDT plus ADT vs 17 months (95% CI, 15 to 23) with ADT alone (HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.69; P < .001).
The combined analysis also showed improved rPFS with MDT plus ADT, with a median rPFS of 39 months (95% CI, 30 to 48) with the combination vs 26 months (95% CI, 22 to 46) with ADT monotherapy (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.97; P = .038). In patients with oligometastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer, the combination of MDT plus ADT also demonstrated superior CRFS vs ADT alone (HR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.19 to 0.82; P = .01). There were no significant differences in OS (P = .13), time to next-line systemic therapy (P = .47), or time to a new lesion (P = .14) between the 2 arms.
Regarding safety, there were no grade 4 or 5 toxicities reported in the MDT plus ADT arm. Grade 3 events that were deemed possibly related to treatment occurred in 6 patients in the MDT plus ADT arm and 2 patients in the ADT monotherapy arm.
“Together, these findings support a paradigm of MDT + ADT providing a clinical benefit to [oligometastatic prostate cancer] patients by delaying the inexorable progression of metastatic prostate cancer to the fatal disease state [androgen deprivation-resistant prostate cancer,]” the authors wrote. “The results of EXTEND showed that, regardless of the ADT approach (iADT vs cADT), the addition of MDT to ADT improved measures of systemic disease control.”
Follow-up in the EXTEND trial remains ongoing to evaluate the effects of treatment on OS, with final completion expected in December 2025.2 However, according to the authors, the present findings warrant confirmatory phase 3 trials of the combination.
They also noted, “These hypothesis-generating findings warrant mechanistic confirmation in preclinical models and may inform the development of blood-based immune biomarkers and future clinical trials combining MDT + ADT with T-cell–targeted immunotherapies.”
REFERENCES
1. Sherry AD, Siddiqui BA, Haymaker C, et al. Continuous androgen deprivation therapy with or without metastasis-directed therapy for oligometastatic prostate cancer: The multicenter phase 2 randomized EXTEND trial. Eur Urol. 2025:S0302-2838(25)00396-3. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2025.07.006
2. Systemic therapy with or without local consolidative therapy in treating patients with oligometastatic solid tumor. ClinicalTrials.gov. Last updated March 13, 2025. Accessed August 6, 2025. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03599765
Newsletter
Stay current with the latest urology news and practice-changing insights — sign up now for the essential updates every urologist needs.


















