
Case 3: A 49-Year-Old Man With Recurrent Non–Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer
Panelists discuss how to approach treatment for a younger (49-year-old) male veteran with bladder cancer, focusing on the rising rates among veterans, challenges with recurrent disease despite BCG therapy, various second- and third-line treatment options, including gemcitabine-docetaxel combination therapy and the importance of thorough monitoring for disease progression.
Video content above is prompted by the following:
Case 3: 49-Year-Old Man With Non–Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer
Key Discussion Themes:
- Young-onset bladder cancer considerations
- Defined as 50 years or younger based on colorectal literature
- Growing concern particularly among veterans (Veterans Affairs has designated bladder cancer as service-related)
- Balancing long-term quality of life with aggressive disease management
- Management of recurrent disease after BCG
- Approach to low-grade vs high-grade recurrences
- Importance of continued surveillance imaging, including upper tracts
- Treatment sequencing considerations for multiple recurrences
- Intravesical gemcitabine/docetaxel therapy
- Practical aspects of administration schedule
- Maintenance therapy importance for chemotherapy efficacy
- Logistical challenges in community practice settings
- Third-line therapy options for BCG-unresponsive disease
- Available FDA-approved options: nadofaragene firadenovec, oportuzumab monatox (N-803), pembrolizumab
- Revisiting radical cystectomy discussion at each recurrence
- Importance of thorough evaluation including prostatic urethra and upper tracts
Notable Expert Insights:
Dr Murray on managing young patients with bladder cancer: “I focus more on those percentages of the possibility of progression of disease because the patient has so many more years to live. With a good TURBT and complete resection, I’m going to give BCG just like I would for older patients.”
Panel perspective on low-grade recurrence after BCG: The panel agreed that low-grade recurrence after BCG for initial high-grade disease represents a “win” scenario that doesn’t warrant radical cystectomy but requires careful monitoring including cytology and upper tract imaging.
Dr Chang on individualized treatment decisions: “It’s a combination of how risk-averse the individual is and how risk-averse the treating physician is. You attempt to individualize and personalize care, get as much information as possible. It is really tough for those in practice that don’t see a lot of bladder cancer patients to navigate the nuances of therapy.”
Dr Schmidt on available treatments for BCG-unresponsive disease: “We could switch therapy. If going the intravesical route, we have gemcitabine/docetaxel as our de facto standard. Valrubicin is still used in Europe and Canada. We also have newer approved agents including nadofaragene [firadenovec], N-803, and oportuzumab monatox. Some receive pembrolizumab systemically. Radical cystectomy may still be on the table.”
Panel consensus on treatment goals: “The goal should be no patient with non-invasive disease should die of their cancer.” The panel emphasized thorough evaluation of prostatic urethra and upper tracts at every recurrence to ensure bladder-sparing approaches remain safe.
Newsletter
Stay current with the latest urology news and practice-changing insights — sign up now for the essential updates every urologist needs.



















