|Videos|August 9, 2022
Factors for Consideration when Choosing an ADT Regimen for mCSPC
Author(s)Jason Hafron, MD
Jason Hafron, MD, revisits the patient profile and discusses factors that inform treatment decision-making in mCSPC.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Related to this article
Carlos A. Vargas, MD, discusses updated survival outcomes, safety, and the mechanism of SYNC-T SV-102, an investigational in situ immunotherapy for metastatic prostate cancer.
The PROTEUS substudy addresses a key limitation of the main study, which had no surgery-alone control arm.
The phase 1/2 CELC-G-201 study found preliminary antitumor activity and manageable toxicity with gedatolisib plus darolutamide in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
Kim Chi, MD, FRCPC, discusses the rationale and design of the phase 3 KLK2-comPAS trial evaluating pasritamig alone and in combination with JNJ-9401 in patients with mCRPC.
Longer-term findings from the phase 2 ARACOG study suggest differences in objectively measured cognitive function between ARPIs.
Chad R. Ritch, MD, MBA, FACS, discusses how PSMA-PET informs staging, treatment planning, recurrence workup, and the interpretation of equivocal findings.
Jeffrey M. Spier, MD, discusses how fatigue may impact patient quality-of-life and when dose reduction may be an appropriate treatment strategy.
Jeffrey M. Spier, MD, reviews evidence on ARPI dose reduction in prostate cancer and discusses monitoring treatment response, tolerability, and dose reescalation.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on Urology Times
1
PROTEUS Substudy: Perioperative apalutamide plus ADT improves EFS vs surgery alone
2
VOLGA: Durvalumab plus enfortumab vedotin improves EFS, OS in MIBC
3
In situ immunotherapy shows encouraging survival findings in prostate cancer
4
Adding perioperative pembrolizumab to chemotherapy does not improve EFS in MIBC
5