Opinion|Videos|August 30, 2024
Overview of Abiraterone and the Differences Between Formulations
Author(s)Gautam Jayram, MD, Christopher Pieczonka, MD
This discussion provides an overview of abiraterone and the key differences between micronized and non-micronized formulations, including considerations for choosing between the two formulations.
Advertisement
Episodes in this series
- Please provide a brief overview of abiraterone and the key differences between micronized and non-micronized formulations.
- How do you approach deciding between the 2 formulations (micronized vs non-micronized)?
Advertisement
Related to this article
VIR-5500 is a PSMA-targeted PRO-XTEN dual-masked T-cell engager entering phase 3 development for prostate cancer.
Abraham Morgentaler, MD, reviews evidence showing no association between testosterone therapy and prostate cancer risk and explains the saturation model of androgen action.
Based on these results, the trial protocol has been amended to move enrollment earlier in the course of disease progression.
An analysis of NRG/RTOG 0815 found Decipher predicted distant metastasis risk and identified patients with greater benefit from short-term ADT.
Exploratory analyses suggest persistent immune remodeling after aglatimagene plus radiation in localized prostate cancer.
Brian Mazzarella, MD, discusses the landscape for intermediate-risk prostate cancer and early VAPOR 2 findings on water vapor ablation.
The phase 3 BiPASS trial is evaluating the use of 68Ga-PSMA-PET in combination with MRI for pre-biopsy prostate cancer detection.
In RTOG 3506, adding enzalutamide to standard ADT and salvage radiotherapy was associated with 2-year PFS benefit.
Advertisement
Advertisement