
Practical and Logistical Considerations for Utilizing the Gemcitabine Intravesical System
Panelists discuss how practical implementation of the gemcitabine intravesical system requires integrating cystoscopic procedures into urology clinic workflows, training providers (including advanced practice providers) for device placement and removal, and developing effective patient counseling strategies for managing a 3-week indwelling device with proper tracking systems.
Episodes in this series

Practical and Logistical Considerations for Utilizing the Gemcitabine Intravesical System
Clinical Workflow and Resource Requirements
Implementation of the gemcitabine intravesical system requires significant workflow modifications compared with traditional intravesical therapies. Unlike standard instillations performed by clinic nursing staff, device exchange necessitates cystoscopy by trained providers, consuming procedure slots and requiring dedicated cystoscopy equipment. This procedural requirement may impact practice scheduling and resource allocation, particularly during the initial adjustment period. Advanced practice providers already performing cystoscopy and stent removals represent an ideal workforce for this procedure, as the skill set translates well to device retrieval and deployment. Integration into urology clinic workflows will be essential, contrasting with the trend toward infusion center administration for some newer intravesical agents.
Learning Curve and Training Requirements
The procedural learning curve for device implementation appears manageable for practicing urologists. Device retrieval using cystoscopy parallels familiar procedures like stent removal, whereas catheter-based deployment requires minimal additional training. Initial clinical experience suggests that after several procedures, the workflow becomes relatively straightforward once optimal logistics are established with nursing and support staff. Real-world implementation will provide clearer insights into the actual learning curve as urologists gain experience following recent FDA approval. The procedural nature of device exchange offers potential advantages for practices already utilizing advanced practice providers for similar interventions.
Patient Management and Safety Considerations
Patient counseling should emphasize the generally well-tolerated nature of the device as demonstrated in clinical trials, with reassurance that patients can maintain normal daily activities during the 3-week dwell period. Critical safety messaging must include strict adherence to the 3-week exchange schedule and importance of maintaining scheduled follow-up appointments. Development of tracking systems, potentially integrated with electronic medical records, would enhance safety monitoring and prevent inadvertent prolonged device retention. Such systems, similar to those used for ureteral stents in some practices, could provide automated reminders and improve overall device management safety protocols.
Newsletter
Stay current with the latest urology news and practice-changing insights — sign up now for the essential updates every urologist needs.


















