
Opinion|Videos|August 23, 2024
Risk Stratification in Prostate Cancer Patients
Medical oncologists explore risk stratification strategies for newly diagnosed patients with prostate cancer, emphasizing the significant role of the Gleason score in diagnosis and prognosis.
Advertisement
Episodes in this series

Video content above is prompted by the following question:
- How do you approach risk stratification in prostate cancer patients, specifically in those newly diagnosed? (Brian Richardson, MD)
- Do you rely on the Gleason score, specific biomarkers, or a combination?
Advertisement
Related to this article

Longer-term findings from the phase 2 ARACOG study suggest differences in objectively measured cognitive function between ARPIs.

Chad R. Ritch, MD, MBA, FACS, discusses how PSMA-PET informs staging, treatment planning, recurrence workup, and the interpretation of equivocal findings.

Jeffrey M. Spier, MD, discusses how fatigue may impact patient quality-of-life and when dose reduction may be an appropriate treatment strategy.

Jeffrey M. Spier, MD, reviews evidence on ARPI dose reduction in prostate cancer and discusses monitoring treatment response, tolerability, and dose reescalation.

Jeffrey M. Spier, MD, discusses managing ARPI-related fatigue through dose adjustments, patient monitoring, and strategies to maintain treatment adherence.

Moderators and participants reviewed ARANOTE, ARACOG, and ARASEC data and how they inform individualized treatment for mCSPC.

Jack R. Andrews, MD, discusses BED-PSMA-411 findings comparing PSMA-PET detection rates and urinary excretion in prostate cancer biochemical recurrence.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on Urology Times
1
How PSMA-PET shapes staging and recurrence workup in prostate cancer
2
ESMO 2026: Key presentations across genitourinary oncology
3
Engy Habashy, MD, on the role of androgens in GSM management
4
European Commission approves perioperative pembrolizumab plus enfortumab vedotin for MIBC
5





