
Opinion|Videos|April 3, 2025
Communication of Treatment Options for High-Risk NMIBC
Experts discuss how they communicate various treatment options for non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) with patients and health care professionals.
Advertisement
Episodes in this series

Video content above is prompted by the following:
- How do you communicate various options for NMIBC with patients and healthcare professionals?
Advertisement
Related to this article

At a median follow-up of 60.9 months, median EFS was 74.1 months in the pembrolizumab arm and not reached in the placebo arm.

The phase 1/2 CELC-G-201 study found preliminary antitumor activity and manageable toxicity with gedatolisib plus darolutamide in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Kim Chi, MD, FRCPC, discusses the rationale and design of the phase 3 KLK2-comPAS trial evaluating pasritamig alone and in combination with JNJ-9401 in patients with mCRPC.

Longer-term findings from the phase 2 ARACOG study suggest differences in objectively measured cognitive function between ARPIs.

Engy Habashy, MD, discusses key takeaways from the 2025 AUA GSM guideline, including the role of androgens and hormonal therapies in managing genitourinary syndrome of menopause.

Chad R. Ritch, MD, MBA, FACS, discusses how PSMA-PET informs staging, treatment planning, recurrence workup, and the interpretation of equivocal findings.

Michael S. Cookson, MD, MMHC, FACS, discusses how Anktiva’s expanded FDA approval may broaden bladder-preserving treatment options for BCG-unresponsive papillary-only NMIBC.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on Urology Times
1
How PSMA-PET shapes staging and recurrence workup in prostate cancer
2
ESMO 2026: Key presentations across genitourinary oncology
3
Darolutamide associated with less cognitive change than enzalutamide in prostate cancer
4
European Commission approves perioperative pembrolizumab plus enfortumab vedotin for MIBC
5


