
Opinion|Videos|April 10, 2025
Operationalizing TAR-200 and Other Delivery Systems in Practice
Experts discuss whether novel delivery systems in non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) could be easily adopted in clinical practice and the challenges they anticipate in operationalizing TAR-200 and other novel delivery systems in urology practices.
Advertisement
Episodes in this series

Video content above is prompted by the following:
- Looking forward, do you believe novel delivery systems in NMIBC could be easily adopted in clinical practices?
- What challenges do you anticipate in operationalizing TAR-200 and other novel delivery systems in urology practices?
Advertisement
Related to this article

Peter Clark, MD, discusses key updates to NMIBC guidelines, including revisions to risk stratification, the emerging role of biomarkers, and how to navigate treatment options for BCG-unresponsive disease.

The AMA issued separate codes for subfascial and subcutaneous implantation of a tibial neuromodulation device.

Exploratory analyses suggest persistent immune remodeling after aglatimagene plus radiation in localized prostate cancer.

John P. Sfakianos, MD, discusses how ctDNA can be optimally integrated into bladder cancer clinical trials.

Robert J. Motzer, MD, discusses the significance of the belzutifan plus lenvatinib approval, adverse event management with the combination, and the evolving role of HIF-2α inhibition in ccRCC.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on Urology Times
1
AMA issues Category I CPT codes for implantable tibial neuromodulation in UUI
2
The UroOnc Minute: Key Updates to the AUA NMIBC Guideline, With Peter E. Clark, MD
3
Aglatimagene besadenovec shows sustained immune remodeling in localized prostate cancer
4
John Sfakianos, MD, on integrating ctDNA into bladder cancer trials
5




