Opinion|Videos|November 6, 2026

DASL-HiCaP Interim Results in Very High-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer

Tamim Niazi, MDCM, unpacks the interim DASL-HiCaP data, why conventional imaging was the chosen yardstick, and how to frame 96 weeks of therapy for patients.

Tamim Niazi, MDCM, opens by reviewing the 2022 STAMPEDE meta-analysis, in which adding abiraterone acetate (Zytiga) and prednisolone to 3 years of hormone therapy improved metastasis-free survival, with an overall survival benefit subsequently confirmed. The findings changed practice, he says, including in Canada for patients meeting STAMPEDE (NCT00268476) criteria.

He explains that when DASL-HiCaP (NCT04136353) was designed, the standard for both primary and salvage patients was locoregional radiation therapy with or without long-term ADT, and STAMPEDE had not yet read out. Which patients benefit from intensification remains unclear, he notes, so DASL-HiCaP defined a new very high-risk group across both settings.

At the interim analysis, the prespecified boundary was crossed and the independent data monitoring committee recommended release. Four-year metastasis-free survival by conventional imaging improved from 88% with placebo to 95% with darolutamide (HR, 0.42), a 58% risk reduction. With a tight confidence interval well below 1, he expects the result to hold at next year's final analysis and, per the ICECaP meta-analysis, potentially translate to an overall survival benefit.1,2

More than 70% of enrolled patients had grade group 5 disease and nearly 30% had nodal disease, a population Niazi says is common in practice. He places the DASL-HiCaP definition between STAMPEDE and the broader ENZARAD (NCT02446444) and ATLAS (NCT02531516) eligibility criteria, closer to STAMPEDE. He adds that metastasis-free survival by conventional imaging was chosen as the primary end point as a validated surrogate and notes an early signal of fewer prostate cancer deaths with darolutamide. On safety, profiles were similar between arms, with no new toxicity and most of the grade 3 or higher difference explained by fatigue.

In the next episode, Niazi compares the salvage findings with EMBARK (NCT02319837), discusses treatment duration, and names the referral change he wants urologists to make.


Related to this article