Opinion|Videos|June 17, 2024
Understanding Differences in Fusion-Guided Biopsy Technologies
Experts on prostate cancer focus on the differences between fusion-guided technologies, highlighting cognitive-based and software-based fusions.
Advertisement
Episodes in this series
Video content above is prompted by the following questions:
- When considering fusion-guided technologies, what is the difference between cognitive-based fusion and software-based fusion? What about rigid fusion and elastic fusion?
Advertisement
Related to this article
Exploratory analyses suggest persistent immune remodeling after aglatimagene plus radiation in localized prostate cancer.
Brian Mazzarella, MD, discusses the landscape for intermediate-risk prostate cancer and early VAPOR 2 findings on water vapor ablation.
The phase 3 BiPASS trial is evaluating the use of 68Ga-PSMA-PET in combination with MRI for pre-biopsy prostate cancer detection.
In RTOG 3506, adding enzalutamide to standard ADT and salvage radiotherapy was associated with 2-year PFS benefit.
In the phase 3 PACE-A trial, SBRT and prostatectomy showed similar 8-year disease control in localized prostate cancer, with lower rates of urinary incontinence after SBRT.
Using PSMA-PET imaging and genomic testing to obtain better information earlier in the disease course changes what clinicians can do with diagnosis and treatment planning.
The registrational study is designed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of 68Ga-DOTA-RM2 vs histopathology in prostate cancer.
A limited market release of SpaceOAR Flex is expected to begin in the US later this year.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on Urology Times
1
The UroOnc Minute: Key Updates to the AUA NMIBC Guideline, With Peter E. Clark, MD
2
AMA issues Category I CPT codes for implantable tibial neuromodulation in UUI
3
Aglatimagene besadenovec shows sustained immune remodeling in localized prostate cancer
4
John Sfakianos, MD, on integrating ctDNA into bladder cancer trials
5