Opinion|Videos|June 17, 2024
Understanding Differences in Fusion-Guided Biopsy Technologies
Experts on prostate cancer focus on the differences between fusion-guided technologies, highlighting cognitive-based and software-based fusions.
Advertisement
Episodes in this series
Video content above is prompted by the following questions:
- When considering fusion-guided technologies, what is the difference between cognitive-based fusion and software-based fusion? What about rigid fusion and elastic fusion?
Advertisement
Related to this article
The phase 1/2 CELC-G-201 study found preliminary antitumor activity and manageable toxicity with gedatolisib plus darolutamide in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
Kim Chi, MD, FRCPC, discusses the rationale and design of the phase 3 KLK2-comPAS trial evaluating pasritamig alone and in combination with JNJ-9401 in patients with mCRPC.
Longer-term findings from the phase 2 ARACOG study suggest differences in objectively measured cognitive function between ARPIs.
Chad R. Ritch, MD, MBA, FACS, discusses how PSMA-PET informs staging, treatment planning, recurrence workup, and the interpretation of equivocal findings.
Jeffrey M. Spier, MD, discusses how fatigue may impact patient quality-of-life and when dose reduction may be an appropriate treatment strategy.
Jeffrey M. Spier, MD, reviews evidence on ARPI dose reduction in prostate cancer and discusses monitoring treatment response, tolerability, and dose reescalation.
Jeffrey M. Spier, MD, discusses managing ARPI-related fatigue through dose adjustments, patient monitoring, and strategies to maintain treatment adherence.
Moderators and participants reviewed ARANOTE, ARACOG, and ARASEC data and how they inform individualized treatment for mCSPC.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on Urology Times
1
ESMO 2026: Key presentations across genitourinary oncology
2
Darolutamide associated with less cognitive change than enzalutamide in prostate cancer
3
How PSMA-PET shapes staging and recurrence workup in prostate cancer
4
KLK2-comPAS trial explores dual T-cell engagement in mCRPC
5