|Videos|August 11, 2022
Clinical Implications of Using Genomic Testing Results in Prostate Cancer Risk-Stratification and Treatment Selection
Author(s)Stephen J. Freedland, MD
Dr Freedland discusses the clinical implications of using genomic test results for management of patients with prostate cancer.
Advertisement
Episodes in this series
Advertisement
Related to this article
These FAQs outline key recommendations from ASTRO's updated guideline on shorter-course radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer.
Updated CAPItello-281 data support capivasertib plus abiraterone in PTEN-deficient mHSPC, according to Daniel J. George, MD.
Benjamin Garmezy, MD, discusses personalizing mHSPC treatment intensification based on disease burden, molecular biomarkers, and patient-specific factors.
Biomarkers including HRR mutations, PTEN loss, and PSMA expression can guide triplet selection in mHSPC, according to Benjamin Garmezy, MD.
Alicia Morgans, MD, discusses ARACOG findings on cognitive outcomes with darolutamide vs enzalutamide and the influence of genetic dementia risk.
Aaron Berger, MD, discusses patient selection for ARPI treatment holidays, monitoring during interruptions, and the role of testosterone recovery in interpreting PSA kinetics.
Tamim Niazi, MDCM, reviews DASL-HiCaP findings showing improved metastasis-free survival with darolutamide added to ADT and radiation therapy.
Chad Ritch, MD, discusses differences between PSMA-PET imaging agents and the need for further evidence to guide clinical decision-making.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on Urology Times
1
Patient priorities guide treatment choice in BCG-unresponsive NMIBC
2
Modern BCG outperforms historic benchmarks in high-risk NMIBC
3
Q&A: Gary Kirsh, MD, on health policy for independent urology
4
Suzanne B. Merrill, MD, on the evolving perioperative landscape in MIBC
5