
Opinion|Videos|April 25, 2025
Key Differences Between Enzalutamide and Darolutamide
Author(s)Arun Azad, PhD, MBBS
A panelist discusses how enzalutamide and darolutamide differ in their molecular structures and pharmacokinetic profiles, with darolutamide showing lower blood-brain barrier penetration, which potentially contributes to its reduced central nervous system adverse effects compared with enzalutamide.
Advertisement
Episodes in this series

Summary for Physicians: Key Differences Between Enzalutamide and Darolutamide
Although both enzalutamide and darolutamide are androgen receptor inhibitors, they have several important distinguishing characteristics:
- Blood-brain barrier penetration: Darolutamide has negligible blood-brain barrier penetration, potentially resulting in fewer central nervous system adverse effects compared with enzalutamide.
- Chemical structure: Darolutamide has a distinct chemical structure with lower binding affinity to GABA-A receptors.
- Drug interactions: Darolutamide has a different drug interaction profile and may be preferable in patients on multiple medications.
- Adverse effect profile: Darolutamide may be associated with lower incidence of fatigue, falls, and cognitive effects compared with enzalutamide.
- Specific indications: Although both are approved for nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, they may have different additional approved indications depending on region.
These differences may influence clinical decision-making when selecting between these agents for individual patients.
Advertisement
Related to this article

Jessica Rett, PhD, joins Adam B. Weiner, MD, to discuss how medical terminology and common metaphors shape patient understanding and communication in cancer care.

Aaron Berger, MD, discusses testosterone recovery after prostate cancer therapy interruption and its implications for quality of life, PSA kinetics, and treatment decisions.

Kiran Sury, MD, discusses patient selection, durability, and adverse events with ProACT for male stress urinary incontinence.

The designation was supported by findings from the phase 2 Co-PSMA trial, the phase 1/2 COBRA trial, and real-world evidence.

American Cancer Society updates prostate cancer screening guidelines, recommends regular PSA testing
The updated guidance recommends routine PSA-based screening every 2 years for average-risk men aged 50 to 69 years and annual screening beginning at age 45 for Black men or men with a strong family history of prostate cancer.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on Urology Times
1
Treatment interruptions in prostate cancer: Balancing PSA kinetics and quality of life
2
FDA approves durvalumab plus enfortumab vedotin for cisplatin-ineligible MIBC
3
American Cancer Society updates prostate cancer screening guidelines, recommends regular PSA testing
4
The UroOnc Minute: The Role of Language in Cancer Care, With Jessica Rett, PhD
5


