
Opinion|Videos|April 25, 2025
Key Differences Between Enzalutamide and Darolutamide
Author(s)Arun Azad, PhD, MBBS
A panelist discusses how enzalutamide and darolutamide differ in their molecular structures and pharmacokinetic profiles, with darolutamide showing lower blood-brain barrier penetration, which potentially contributes to its reduced central nervous system adverse effects compared with enzalutamide.
Advertisement
Episodes in this series

Summary for Physicians: Key Differences Between Enzalutamide and Darolutamide
Although both enzalutamide and darolutamide are androgen receptor inhibitors, they have several important distinguishing characteristics:
- Blood-brain barrier penetration: Darolutamide has negligible blood-brain barrier penetration, potentially resulting in fewer central nervous system adverse effects compared with enzalutamide.
- Chemical structure: Darolutamide has a distinct chemical structure with lower binding affinity to GABA-A receptors.
- Drug interactions: Darolutamide has a different drug interaction profile and may be preferable in patients on multiple medications.
- Adverse effect profile: Darolutamide may be associated with lower incidence of fatigue, falls, and cognitive effects compared with enzalutamide.
- Specific indications: Although both are approved for nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, they may have different additional approved indications depending on region.
These differences may influence clinical decision-making when selecting between these agents for individual patients.
Advertisement
Related to this article

The PROTEUS substudy addresses a key limitation of the main study, which had no surgery-alone control arm.

At a median follow-up of 60.9 months, median EFS was 74.1 months in the pembrolizumab arm and not reached in the placebo arm.

The phase 1/2 CELC-G-201 study found preliminary antitumor activity and manageable toxicity with gedatolisib plus darolutamide in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Kim Chi, MD, FRCPC, discusses the rationale and design of the phase 3 KLK2-comPAS trial evaluating pasritamig alone and in combination with JNJ-9401 in patients with mCRPC.

Longer-term findings from the phase 2 ARACOG study suggest differences in objectively measured cognitive function between ARPIs.

Engy Habashy, MD, discusses key takeaways from the 2025 AUA GSM guideline, including the role of androgens and hormonal therapies in managing genitourinary syndrome of menopause.

Chad R. Ritch, MD, MBA, FACS, discusses how PSMA-PET informs staging, treatment planning, recurrence workup, and the interpretation of equivocal findings.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on Urology Times
1
Darolutamide associated with less cognitive change than enzalutamide in prostate cancer
2
Adding perioperative pembrolizumab to chemotherapy does not improve EFS in MIBC
3
KLK2-comPAS trial explores dual T-cell engagement in mCRPC
4
Gedatolisib plus darolutamide shows preliminary activity in mCRPC
5

