
Opinion|Videos|April 25, 2025
Key Differences Between Enzalutamide and Darolutamide
Author(s)Arun Azad, PhD, MBBS
A panelist discusses how enzalutamide and darolutamide differ in their molecular structures and pharmacokinetic profiles, with darolutamide showing lower blood-brain barrier penetration, which potentially contributes to its reduced central nervous system adverse effects compared with enzalutamide.
Advertisement
Episodes in this series

Summary for Physicians: Key Differences Between Enzalutamide and Darolutamide
Although both enzalutamide and darolutamide are androgen receptor inhibitors, they have several important distinguishing characteristics:
- Blood-brain barrier penetration: Darolutamide has negligible blood-brain barrier penetration, potentially resulting in fewer central nervous system adverse effects compared with enzalutamide.
- Chemical structure: Darolutamide has a distinct chemical structure with lower binding affinity to GABA-A receptors.
- Drug interactions: Darolutamide has a different drug interaction profile and may be preferable in patients on multiple medications.
- Adverse effect profile: Darolutamide may be associated with lower incidence of fatigue, falls, and cognitive effects compared with enzalutamide.
- Specific indications: Although both are approved for nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, they may have different additional approved indications depending on region.
These differences may influence clinical decision-making when selecting between these agents for individual patients.
Advertisement
Related to this article

Peter Clark, MD, discusses key updates to NMIBC guidelines, including revisions to risk stratification, the emerging role of biomarkers, and how to navigate treatment options for BCG-unresponsive disease.

The AMA issued separate codes for subfascial and subcutaneous implantation of a tibial neuromodulation device.

Exploratory analyses suggest persistent immune remodeling after aglatimagene plus radiation in localized prostate cancer.

John P. Sfakianos, MD, discusses how ctDNA can be optimally integrated into bladder cancer clinical trials.

Robert J. Motzer, MD, discusses the significance of the belzutifan plus lenvatinib approval, adverse event management with the combination, and the evolving role of HIF-2α inhibition in ccRCC.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on Urology Times
1
AMA issues Category I CPT codes for implantable tibial neuromodulation in UUI
2
Aglatimagene besadenovec shows sustained immune remodeling in localized prostate cancer
3
The UroOnc Minute: Key Updates to the AUA NMIBC Guideline, With Peter E. Clark, MD
4
John Sfakianos, MD, on integrating ctDNA into bladder cancer trials
5



