
Opinion|Videos|May 2, 2025
Treatment Decisions in Patients With Low- vs High-Volume Disease
Author(s)Arun Azad, PhD, MBBS
A panelist discusses how these comparative results could influence clinical decision-making by suggesting potentially different magnitudes of benefit between enzalutamide and darolutamide depending on disease volume, with the treatment effect differences possibly being more pronounced in high-volume disease patients, although individual patient factors should still guide personalized therapy selection.
Advertisement
Episodes in this series

Summary for Physicians: Treatment Decisions Based on Disease Volume
The impact of disease volume (high vs low) on treatment selection:
- Both androgen receptor (AR) pathway inhibitors (enzalutamide and darolutamide) demonstrate benefit regardless of disease volume.
- The magnitude of benefit may differ between high-volume and low-volume disease subgroups.
- In high-volume disease: Consider more aggressive approaches; combination therapy may provide more substantial benefits.
- In low-volume disease: AR pathway inhibitors show particularly favorable outcomes, potentially allowing some patients to delay chemotherapy.
Clinical decision-making implications:
- Disease volume should be 1 factor among several in treatment selection.
- Individual patient characteristics (age, comorbidities, performance status) remain critical considerations.
- Treatment goals (rapid disease control vs quality-of-life prioritization) may vary based on disease burden.
- Regular reassessment of disease status is important as volume can change over time.
Treatment decisions should be individualized through shared decision-making that considers disease volume alongside other patient-specific factors.
Advertisement
Related to this article

The PROTEUS substudy addresses a key limitation of the main study, which had no surgery-alone control arm.

At a median follow-up of 60.9 months, median EFS was 74.1 months in the pembrolizumab arm and not reached in the placebo arm.

The phase 1/2 CELC-G-201 study found preliminary antitumor activity and manageable toxicity with gedatolisib plus darolutamide in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Kim Chi, MD, FRCPC, discusses the rationale and design of the phase 3 KLK2-comPAS trial evaluating pasritamig alone and in combination with JNJ-9401 in patients with mCRPC.

Longer-term findings from the phase 2 ARACOG study suggest differences in objectively measured cognitive function between ARPIs.

Engy Habashy, MD, discusses key takeaways from the 2025 AUA GSM guideline, including the role of androgens and hormonal therapies in managing genitourinary syndrome of menopause.

Chad R. Ritch, MD, MBA, FACS, discusses how PSMA-PET informs staging, treatment planning, recurrence workup, and the interpretation of equivocal findings.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on Urology Times
1
Darolutamide associated with less cognitive change than enzalutamide in prostate cancer
2
Adding perioperative pembrolizumab to chemotherapy does not improve EFS in MIBC
3
KLK2-comPAS trial explores dual T-cell engagement in mCRPC
4
Gedatolisib plus darolutamide shows preliminary activity in mCRPC
5

