
Treatment Decisions in Patients With Low- vs High-Volume Disease
A panelist discusses how these comparative results could influence clinical decision-making by suggesting potentially different magnitudes of benefit between enzalutamide and darolutamide depending on disease volume, with the treatment effect differences possibly being more pronounced in high-volume disease patients, although individual patient factors should still guide personalized therapy selection.
Episodes in this series

Summary for Physicians: Treatment Decisions Based on Disease Volume
The impact of disease volume (high vs low) on treatment selection:
- Both androgen receptor (AR) pathway inhibitors (enzalutamide and darolutamide) demonstrate benefit regardless of disease volume.
- The magnitude of benefit may differ between high-volume and low-volume disease subgroups.
- In high-volume disease: Consider more aggressive approaches; combination therapy may provide more substantial benefits.
- In low-volume disease: AR pathway inhibitors show particularly favorable outcomes, potentially allowing some patients to delay chemotherapy.
Clinical decision-making implications:
- Disease volume should be 1 factor among several in treatment selection.
- Individual patient characteristics (age, comorbidities, performance status) remain critical considerations.
- Treatment goals (rapid disease control vs quality-of-life prioritization) may vary based on disease burden.
- Regular reassessment of disease status is important as volume can change over time.
Treatment decisions should be individualized through shared decision-making that considers disease volume alongside other patient-specific factors.
Newsletter
Stay current with the latest urology news and practice-changing insights — sign up now for the essential updates every urologist needs.