
Opinion|Videos|May 2, 2025
Treatment Decisions in Patients With Low- vs High-Volume Disease
Author(s)Arun Azad, PhD, MBBS
A panelist discusses how these comparative results could influence clinical decision-making by suggesting potentially different magnitudes of benefit between enzalutamide and darolutamide depending on disease volume, with the treatment effect differences possibly being more pronounced in high-volume disease patients, although individual patient factors should still guide personalized therapy selection.
Advertisement
Episodes in this series

Summary for Physicians: Treatment Decisions Based on Disease Volume
The impact of disease volume (high vs low) on treatment selection:
- Both androgen receptor (AR) pathway inhibitors (enzalutamide and darolutamide) demonstrate benefit regardless of disease volume.
- The magnitude of benefit may differ between high-volume and low-volume disease subgroups.
- In high-volume disease: Consider more aggressive approaches; combination therapy may provide more substantial benefits.
- In low-volume disease: AR pathway inhibitors show particularly favorable outcomes, potentially allowing some patients to delay chemotherapy.
Clinical decision-making implications:
- Disease volume should be 1 factor among several in treatment selection.
- Individual patient characteristics (age, comorbidities, performance status) remain critical considerations.
- Treatment goals (rapid disease control vs quality-of-life prioritization) may vary based on disease burden.
- Regular reassessment of disease status is important as volume can change over time.
Treatment decisions should be individualized through shared decision-making that considers disease volume alongside other patient-specific factors.
Advertisement
Related to this article

Peter Clark, MD, discusses key updates to NMIBC guidelines, including revisions to risk stratification, the emerging role of biomarkers, and how to navigate treatment options for BCG-unresponsive disease.

The AMA issued separate codes for subfascial and subcutaneous implantation of a tibial neuromodulation device.

Exploratory analyses suggest persistent immune remodeling after aglatimagene plus radiation in localized prostate cancer.

John P. Sfakianos, MD, discusses how ctDNA can be optimally integrated into bladder cancer clinical trials.

Robert J. Motzer, MD, discusses the significance of the belzutifan plus lenvatinib approval, adverse event management with the combination, and the evolving role of HIF-2α inhibition in ccRCC.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on Urology Times
1
AMA issues Category I CPT codes for implantable tibial neuromodulation in UUI
2
Aglatimagene besadenovec shows sustained immune remodeling in localized prostate cancer
3
The UroOnc Minute: Key Updates to the AUA NMIBC Guideline, With Peter E. Clark, MD
4
John Sfakianos, MD, on integrating ctDNA into bladder cancer trials
5



