
Opinion|Videos|May 2, 2025
Findings in the Docetaxel-Naive Patient Population
Author(s)Arun Azad, PhD, MBBS
A panelist discusses how the findings in the docetaxel-naive population show distinct differences in treatment efficacy, with potentially greater benefits observed for certain androgen receptor pathway inhibitors, which suggests clinicians should consider these differential outcomes when sequencing therapies for patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) who have not previously received chemotherapy.
Advertisement
Episodes in this series

Summary for Physicians: Findings in DOC-Naive Population and Clinical Implications
In the docetaxel (DOC)-naive population:
- Treatment benefit appears consistent with the overall study population across both enzalutamide and darolutamide trials.
- Radiographic progression-free survival improvements remain significant compared with ADT alone.
- No clear efficacy differences between the agents have been definitively established in this specific subgroup.
- Treatment sequencing decisions (androgen receptor [AR] pathway inhibitor first vs docetaxel first) remain an area of clinical judgment.
Clinical implications:
- DOC-naive patients represent an important subgroup that may derive substantial benefit from AR pathway inhibitors.
- Treatment selection should consider disease burden, patient fitness for chemotherapy, comorbidities, and patient preference.
- For patients unlikely to tolerate docetaxel, either enzalutamide or darolutamide plus androgen deprivation therapy provides a valuable treatment option.
- Monitoring for long-term outcomes in this subpopulation remains important as data mature.
These findings support the role of AR pathway inhibitors as effective first-line options in DOC-naive patients with mHSPC.
Advertisement
Related to this article

Jessica Rett, PhD, joins Adam B. Weiner, MD, to discuss how medical terminology and common metaphors shape patient understanding and communication in cancer care.

Aaron Berger, MD, discusses testosterone recovery after prostate cancer therapy interruption and its implications for quality of life, PSA kinetics, and treatment decisions.

Kiran Sury, MD, discusses patient selection, durability, and adverse events with ProACT for male stress urinary incontinence.

The designation was supported by findings from the phase 2 Co-PSMA trial, the phase 1/2 COBRA trial, and real-world evidence.

American Cancer Society updates prostate cancer screening guidelines, recommends regular PSA testing
The updated guidance recommends routine PSA-based screening every 2 years for average-risk men aged 50 to 69 years and annual screening beginning at age 45 for Black men or men with a strong family history of prostate cancer.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on Urology Times
1
Treatment interruptions in prostate cancer: Balancing PSA kinetics and quality of life
2
FDA approves durvalumab plus enfortumab vedotin for cisplatin-ineligible MIBC
3
American Cancer Society updates prostate cancer screening guidelines, recommends regular PSA testing
4
The UroOnc Minute: The Role of Language in Cancer Care, With Jessica Rett, PhD
5


