Opinion|Videos|February 11, 2025
BCG-Unresponsive NMIBC: Balancing Care and Financial Considerations
Author(s)Mark D. Tyson, II, MD, MPH
A panelist discusses how treatment decisions for BCG-unresponsive non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) involve careful consideration of patient preferences, long-term cost-effectiveness, and available financial assistance programs, balancing the higher upfront costs of newer therapies with their potential economic benefits from reduced recurrence rates and treatment frequency.
Advertisement
Episodes in this series
- What is your approach to discussing treatment options with patients, especially when considering the long-term financial impact of different therapies?
- With all the available treatments on the market, what are your patient preferences when it comes to treatment experiences?
- Annual cost analyses suggest that some newer therapies may have higher upfront costs but can be more economical in the long run due to fewer recurrences and less frequent administration.
- How does the cost-effectiveness of treatments, particularly in relation to newer therapies, influence your recommendations for patients with BCG-unresponsive NMIBC?
- Are there specific tools or resources you rely on to help assess and present these options to patients?
- What financial assistance or patient support programs (eg, co-pay cards, patient assistance foundations, or programs) have you found most helpful in ensuring patients can afford and access the right treatments, and how do you guide patients in utilizing these resources?
Advertisement
Related to this article
Pasritamig is being evaluated with or without JNJ-9401 in the ongoing phase 3 KLK2-comPAS trial.
The combination of nogapendekin alfa inbakicept plus BCG demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in efficacy vs BCG alone.
These FAQs outline key recommendations from ASTRO's updated guideline on shorter-course radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer.
Patient goals, disease features, and response to prior therapy guide treatment choices across high-risk NMIBC, according to Suzanne B. Merrill, MD, FACS.
Suzanne B. Merrill, MD, discusses emerging perioperative approaches in MIBC and the potential for more personalized treatment selection based on disease characteristics.
BCG monotherapy and a high-quality TURBT remain the foundation for BCG-naive high-risk NMIBC, according to Vignesh T. Packiam, MD.
Independent urology practices head into 2027 facing a conversion factor cut, prior authorization hurdles, and Part B drug price negotiation, according to Gary Kirsh, MD.
Updated CAPItello-281 data support capivasertib plus abiraterone in PTEN-deficient mHSPC, according to Daniel J. George, MD.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on Urology Times
1
Patient priorities guide treatment choice in BCG-unresponsive NMIBC
2
Pasritamig combination yields 73% PSA response rate in phase 1 mCRPC study
3
FAQ: ASTRO guideline on hypofractionated radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer
4
Nogapendekin alfa inbakicept plus BCG meets primary end point in BCG-naïve NMIBC
5