Opinion|Videos|December 18, 2024
Gene Therapy Considerations for BCG-Unresponsive NMIBC
Author(s)Katie S. Murray, DO, MS
Key Takeaways
- BCG-unresponsive NMIBC is defined by persistent or recurrent high-grade tumors or carcinoma in situ after adequate BCG therapy.
- This condition requires alternative therapeutic strategies or radical cystectomy due to the failure of BCG treatment.
Katie S. Murray, DO, emphasizes the importance of administering newer treatments for BCG-unresponsive non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) locally by urologists, which helps reduce the overall burden on patients, minimizes systemic adverse effects, and eliminates the need for travel to specialized oncology centers, while also recommending strategies to encourage health care providers to adopt these treatments, including education on clinical trial data and real-world efficacy.
Advertisement
Episodes in this series
- From an operational standpoint, how important is it that these treatments can be administered by urologists locally, without the need to refer patients to oncology centers? Please discuss:
- Overall burden on patients
- Systemic adverse effects
- Travel to specialized centers
- What strategies would you recommend to encourage more health care providers to adopt newer treatment modalities for BCG-unresponsive NMIBC?
Advertisement
Related to this article
Peter Clark, MD, discusses key updates to NMIBC guidelines, including revisions to risk stratification, the emerging role of biomarkers, and how to navigate treatment options for BCG-unresponsive disease.
The AMA issued separate codes for subfascial and subcutaneous implantation of a tibial neuromodulation device.
Exploratory analyses suggest persistent immune remodeling after aglatimagene plus radiation in localized prostate cancer.
Heather Florio joins to discuss the potential role of supplements in pelvic and sexual health.
John P. Sfakianos, MD, discusses how ctDNA can be optimally integrated into bladder cancer clinical trials.
A recap of the FDA submissions and regulatory decisions in urology from September 2026.
Robert J. Motzer, MD, discusses the significance of the belzutifan plus lenvatinib approval, adverse event management with the combination, and the evolving role of HIF-2α inhibition in ccRCC.
Brian Mazzarella, MD, discusses the landscape for intermediate-risk prostate cancer and early VAPOR 2 findings on water vapor ablation.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on Urology Times
1
Avoiding False Positives on Prostate Cancer PSMA PET Scans
2
The UroOnc Minute: Key Updates to the AUA NMIBC Guideline, With Peter E. Clark, MD
3
John Sfakianos, MD, on integrating ctDNA into bladder cancer trials
4
AMA issues Category I CPT codes for implantable tibial neuromodulation in UUI
5