
Opinion|Videos|February 18, 2025
Future Directions of BCG-Unresponsive NMIBC Management
Author(s)Mark D. Tyson, II, MD, MPH
A panelist discusses how urologists considering newer treatment modalities for BCG-unresponsive non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) should be encouraged by positive clinical trial data while ensuring proper training, patient selection, and establishment of treatment protocols in their practice.
Advertisement
Episodes in this series

- What advice do you have for urologists considering the adoption of newer treatment modalities for BCG-unresponsive NMIBC, especially in light of the positive clinical trial data?
Advertisement
Related to this article

Peter Clark, MD, discusses key updates to NMIBC guidelines, including revisions to risk stratification, the emerging role of biomarkers, and how to navigate treatment options for BCG-unresponsive disease.

The AMA issued separate codes for subfascial and subcutaneous implantation of a tibial neuromodulation device.

Exploratory analyses suggest persistent immune remodeling after aglatimagene plus radiation in localized prostate cancer.

John P. Sfakianos, MD, discusses how ctDNA can be optimally integrated into bladder cancer clinical trials.

Robert J. Motzer, MD, discusses the significance of the belzutifan plus lenvatinib approval, adverse event management with the combination, and the evolving role of HIF-2α inhibition in ccRCC.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on Urology Times
1
The UroOnc Minute: Key Updates to the AUA NMIBC Guideline, With Peter E. Clark, MD
2
Aglatimagene besadenovec shows sustained immune remodeling in localized prostate cancer
3
AMA issues Category I CPT codes for implantable tibial neuromodulation in UUI
4
John Sfakianos, MD, on integrating ctDNA into bladder cancer trials
5





