Opinion|Videos|September 4, 2024
Managing BCG-Unresponsive NMIBC: Cretostimogene Monotherapy vs. Combination Therapy
Panelists discuss their views on using cretostimogene as monotherapy versus combination therapy, the importance for urologists to stay updated on advances for managing BCG-unresponsive NMIBC, and the potential impact of combining cretostimogene with pembrolizumab on addressing unmet needs in NMIBC care.
Advertisement
Episodes in this series
Video content above is prompted by the following questions:
- What are your thoughts regarding cretostimogene as monotherapy versus a combination therapy? Could you comment on how you would use this in your clinical practice either as a monotherapy or combination therapy and which patients may benefit from either approach?
- Why is it important that urologists stay informed about advances in managing BCG-unresponsive NMIBC now that we have multiple therapeutic agents approved in this disease state?
- Please share any closing thoughts regarding the unmet needs that remain in the management of BCG-unresponsive NMIBC, along with the impact cretostimogene plus pembrolizumab combination therapy could have on the overall care of patients with NMIBC.
Newsletter
Stay current with the latest urology news and practice-changing insights — sign up now for the essential updates every urologist needs.
Advertisement
Related Content
Latest CME
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on Urology Times
1
FDA grants clearance to Hugo robotic-assisted surgery system for urologic procedures
2
Apalutamide is linked to fewer CNS-related conditions in patients with nmCRPC
3
Prostate MRI is linked with higher sensitivity, NPV vs micro-ultrasound in pilot study
4
BOND-003: Cretostimogene yields durable 24-month responses in high-grade NMIBC
5
