
Opinion|Videos|September 4, 2024
Managing BCG-Unresponsive NMIBC: Cretostimogene Monotherapy vs. Combination Therapy
Panelists discuss their views on using cretostimogene as monotherapy versus combination therapy, the importance for urologists to stay updated on advances for managing BCG-unresponsive NMIBC, and the potential impact of combining cretostimogene with pembrolizumab on addressing unmet needs in NMIBC care.
Advertisement
Episodes in this series

Video content above is prompted by the following questions:
- What are your thoughts regarding cretostimogene as monotherapy versus a combination therapy? Could you comment on how you would use this in your clinical practice either as a monotherapy or combination therapy and which patients may benefit from either approach?
- Why is it important that urologists stay informed about advances in managing BCG-unresponsive NMIBC now that we have multiple therapeutic agents approved in this disease state?
- Please share any closing thoughts regarding the unmet needs that remain in the management of BCG-unresponsive NMIBC, along with the impact cretostimogene plus pembrolizumab combination therapy could have on the overall care of patients with NMIBC.
Advertisement
Latest CME
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on Urology Times
1
Initial prostate cancer presentation, family history linked to survival in mCRPC
2
State of Men’s Health Act: What urologists need to know
3
Nicole L. Miller, MD, FACS, on persistent LUTS after BPH treatment
4
FDA greenlights phase 1 trial of ADI-212 in mCRPC
5













