
Opinion|Videos|August 27, 2024
Safety Outcomes and Duration of Response in Combination Therapy vs. Monotherapy for BCG UR CIS +/- Papillary Disease
Key opinion leaders examine the comparative safety profiles and response durations of combination therapy versus monotherapy in the treatment of BCG-unresponsive carcinoma in situ with or without papillary disease.
Advertisement
Episodes in this series

Video content above is prompted by the following questions:
- Did safety outcomes with combination therapy vary from those observed with monotherapy cretostimogene or pembrolizumab?
- Can you please talk about the duration of response and how this compares to other agents that have been tested in BCG UR CIS +/- papillary disease?
Newsletter
Stay current with the latest urology news and practice-changing insights — sign up now for the essential updates every urologist needs.
Advertisement
Latest CME
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on Urology Times
1
FDA grants clearance to Hugo robotic-assisted surgery system for urologic procedures
2
Apalutamide is linked to fewer CNS-related conditions in patients with nmCRPC
3
Prostate MRI is linked with higher sensitivity, NPV vs micro-ultrasound in pilot study
4
BOND-003: Cretostimogene yields durable 24-month responses in high-grade NMIBC
5



















