
Opinion|Videos|August 27, 2024
Safety Outcomes and Duration of Response in Combination Therapy vs. Monotherapy for BCG UR CIS +/- Papillary Disease
Key opinion leaders examine the comparative safety profiles and response durations of combination therapy versus monotherapy in the treatment of BCG-unresponsive carcinoma in situ with or without papillary disease.
Advertisement
Episodes in this series

Video content above is prompted by the following questions:
- Did safety outcomes with combination therapy vary from those observed with monotherapy cretostimogene or pembrolizumab?
- Can you please talk about the duration of response and how this compares to other agents that have been tested in BCG UR CIS +/- papillary disease?
Newsletter
Stay current with the latest urology news and practice-changing insights — sign up now for the essential updates every urologist needs.
Advertisement
Latest CME
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on Urology Times
1
FDA grants 510(k) clearance to Break Wave lithotripsy device for kidney stones
2
Practical guide to female pelvic organ–sparing radical cystectomy
3
CaverSTIM device shows initial promise for post-prostatectomy erectile dysfunction
4
Lina Posada Calderon, MD, provides insights on germline BAP1–associated renal cell carcinoma
5







