Alicia Morgans, MD, MPH

The expert faculty emphasized that while new data continue to inform practice, treatment decisions must remain individualized and grounded in patient-specific factors, clinical judgment, and shared decision-making.

The expert faculty discuss the growing importance of incorporating germline and somatic testing into routine clinical workflows, emphasizing that early and comprehensive testing is essential for identifying patients who may benefit from PARP inhibitor–based strategies and other biomarker-driven treatments.

The expert faculty highlight the importance of combining clinical evaluation, laboratory testing, and imaging to guide management decisions and identify disease progression as early as possible.

The expert faculty discuss how the expanding treatment landscape continues to evolve while highlighting the practical challenges associated with ensuring patients remain on therapy over time.

The expert faculty examine how access barriers, insurance coverage, and financial considerations can shape treatment decisions, often requiring clinicians to balance clinical preferences with practical realities.

The expert faculty emphasize that while ARPI-based therapies have significantly improved outcomes, successful treatment requires balancing clinical benefit with quality of life and long-term tolerability.

The expert faculty discuss the opportunities and limitations of comparative analyses, highlighting the importance of understanding potential biases and patient-level factors when applying real-world findings to clinical practice.

As real-world evidence (RWE) becomes increasingly integrated into oncology research, the expert faculty discuss both the strengths and limitations of these analyses and how they complement findings from prospective clinical trials.

As the treatment landscape continues to evolve, the expert faculty discuss how real-world considerations, including treatment access, insurance coverage, and patient costs, can significantly influence therapeutic decisions, sometimes as much as the clinical evidence itself.

As treatment options continue to expand, the expert faculty discuss where current evidence remains limited and identify key areas for future research that may further refine treatment selection and disease management.

This episode, titled “Emerging Treatment Strategies in mCSPC,” features panelists discussing the rapidly evolving treatment landscape in metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) and the growing number of therapeutic approaches being incorporated alongside androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs).

In “Risk Stratification and Treatment Intensification Strategies in mCSPC,” our panel explores how clinicians use clinical, molecular, and genomic risk factors to personalize treatment decisions for patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC). The expert faculty discuss how disease volume, timing of metastasis, tumor burden, PSA kinetics, and patient comorbidities influence risk stratification and guide the selection of doublet, triplet, and metastasis-directed treatment approaches.

In the final episode, “Treatment Intensification in Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer,” the panelists explored the evolving role of treatment intensification strategies for patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC). Using the case of a 63-year-old man with de novo high-volume metastatic disease, the expert faculty discussed how disease burden, patient fitness, comorbidities, and individual treatment goals influence decisions regarding doublet versus triplet therapy.

Panelists explore how clinicians differentiate among available androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI)-based doublet therapies for patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC).

Experts unpack evolving mCSPC care, from ARPIs and chemo to PARP and PSMA advances, plus guideline-driven, personalized therapy choices.

In “Managing High-Risk Biochemical Recurrence in Advanced Prostate Cancer,” our panel explores the evolving treatment landscape for patients experiencing biochemical recurrence following definitive therapy. Through the case of a 75-year-old man with a rising PSA after radical prostatectomy, a rapid PSA doubling time, and multiple cardiovascular and metabolic comorbidities, the expert faculty discuss how risk stratification and patient-specific factors influence treatment selection.

In this episode, “Preserving Quality of Life in Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer,” the expert faculty explores how cognitive function, independence, and patient priorities influence treatment selection for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC). Through the case of a 74-year-old man with low-volume metastatic disease, mild cognitive impairment, and a strong desire to maintain an active lifestyle, the panel examines the importance of treating the whole patient, rather than focusing solely on disease characteristics.

Welcome back to another Urology Times Virtual Tumor Board series. In this episode titled “Navigating Comorbidities and Treatment Decisions in Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer,” expert faculty discuss a patient with advanced prostate cancer whose management highlights the importance of individualized treatment decisions that extend beyond tumor characteristics alone.

Alicia K. Morgans, MD, MPH, discusses key findings from the ARACOG study, assessing cognitive outcomes between patients who received darolutamide vs those who received enzalutamide for advanced prostate cancer.

A real-world analysis found that PSADT was undocumented in most patients with high-risk biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer, potentially delaying treatment initiation and underestimating progression risk.

Alicia Morgans, MD, MPH, shares findings from a real-world study assessing darolutamide or abiraterone in combination with ADT plus docetaxel for mHSPC.

Discover essential strategies for managing advanced prostate cancer, including team collaboration, systematic documentation, and patient care best practices.

Health care professionals discuss the growing preference for oral hormone therapy over injectables, emphasizing patient control and comfort in treatment choices.

Experts discuss the cardiovascular risks associated with androgen deprivation therapy, comparing relugolix and leuprolide's impact on coronary plaque formation.

Healthcare professionals discuss the challenges of staff turnover and the importance of communication and systematic notes to ensure patient safety.

Oncologists discuss the importance of guidelines like NCCN and ASCO for navigating cancer treatment complexities and insurance challenges.

Health care professionals discuss the vital role of pharmacy teams in managing complex patient care, emphasizing collaboration and medication safety.

Urologists discuss the importance of monitoring cardiovascular health in patients undergoing androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer.

Healthcare professionals discuss strategies to manage cardiovascular risks in cancer patients, emphasizing weight control, exercise, and collaboration with primary care.

Healthcare professionals discuss the importance of addressing quality of life and exercise for patients starting androgen deprivation therapy.