Videos

1 expert in this video

Panelist discusses how clinical data from multiple studies demonstrate that aqua ablation therapy offers efficacy comparable with that of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) while providing superior safety, functionality, and durability benefits.

1 expert is featured in this series.

A panelist discusses how clinicians should weigh the decision between enzalutamide and darolutamide for patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) by considering each drug’s efficacy profile alongside their distinct adverse effect patterns, particularly darolutamide’s favorable central nervous system (CNS) toxicity profile vs enzalutamide’s more established long-term data, while also factoring in individual patient characteristics such as age, comorbidities, and potential drug interactions.

1 expert is featured in this series.

A panelist discusses how enzalutamide and darolutamide differ in their molecular structures and pharmacokinetic profiles, with darolutamide showing lower blood-brain barrier penetration, which potentially contributes to its reduced central nervous system adverse effects compared with enzalutamide.

1 expert in this video

Panelist discusses how patient outcomes have evolved over time with different benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) treatments, highlighting improvements in ejaculation preservation, durability, and post procedure complications across various techniques.

1 expert is featured in this series.

A panelist discusses how both the ARCHES and ARANOTE trials demonstrated significant improvements in radiographic progression-free survival with their respective novel hormonal therapies (enzalutamide in ARCHES and apalutamide in ARANOTE) when added to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer, with consistent benefits observed across key subgroups and generally manageable safety profiles.

1 expert is featured in this series.

A panelist discusses how the ARCHES and ARANOTE trials differ in their fundamental design elements, with ARCHES evaluating enzalutamide plus androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) vs placebo plus ADT in both metastatic and nonmetastatic patients, whereas ARANOTE specifically studied darolutamide and ADT vs ADT alone in patients with newly diagnosed metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.