Videos

Panelists discuss how radiopharmaceuticals like lutetium-177 prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) may be preferred over systemic therapy in patients with prostate cancer who have high PSMA expression, multiple bone metastases, and limited visceral disease, particularly after progression on standard therapies like androgen receptor pathway inhibitors and taxane-based chemotherapy.

Panelists discuss how the evolving treatment landscape for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) encompasses multiple therapeutic options including novel hormonal agents, chemotherapy, and targeted therapies while highlighting persistent challenges in treatment sequencing, drug resistance, and the need for improved biomarker-driven approaches to optimize patient outcomes.

Jack Andrews MD; Eugene Cone, MD; and Arash Rezazadeh, MD, discuss how metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer presents clinically, explore current treatment standards including combination therapies, evaluate emerging data from the ARANOTE trial on darolutamide efficacy, consider quality of life factors in treatment selection, and examine how novel therapeutic approaches may reshape future care pathways.

2 experts in this video

Panelists discuss how it would be preferred that BCG monotherapy not remain the first-line treatment for intermediate-risk and high-risk disease within the next 10 years. It is encouraged that the future of first-line treatment be a noninfectious agent that would be easier to develop and include more data.

2 experts in this video

Panelists discuss how PD-L1 inhibitors such as durvalumab and sasanlimab represent a promising frontier in non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) treatment. These immunotherapies work by unleashing the body’s immune response against cancer cells, potentially offering new options for patients whose disease doesn’t respond to conventional therapies such as BCG. Their ongoing phase 3 trials could establish immunotherapy as a valuable addition to the NMIBC treatment landscape.

A panelist discusses how urologists considering newer treatment modalities for BCG-unresponsive non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) should be encouraged by positive clinical trial data while ensuring proper training, patient selection, and establishment of treatment protocols in their practice.

A panelist discusses how the ability to administer newer non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) treatments in local urology practices rather than specialized oncology centers reduces patient burden and travel requirements while suggesting that increased education and support could help more health care providers adopt these treatment options.