Videos

1 expert is featured in this series.

A panelist discusses how Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison (MAIC) analyses are limited by potential unmeasured confounding factors, small effective sample sizes after matching, and reliance on published aggregate data, which should be carefully considered when interpreting findings as complementary rather than definitive evidence for treatment decisions.

1 expert is featured in this series.

A panelist discusses how MAIC (Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison) methodology addresses the lack of head-to-head clinical trials in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) by adjusting for differences in patient characteristics across separate studies to enable more reliable indirect treatment comparisons.

3 experts are featured in this series.

The faculty discusses how ARPI monotherapy may fit into the management of high-risk biochemically recurrent prostate cancer, with a focus on patient selection, trade-offs of monotherapy versus combination therapy, and practical counseling around efficacy, quality of life, and adverse events. The conversation also explores emerging questions around biomarkers, PARP inhibitors, treatment intensification, and how monotherapy may evolve as a therapeutic option in select patients.